High Court of Karnataka Allows Student's Admission in 3-Year Law Course Despite Open Schooling PUC. The court held that a student who passed PUC through correspondence/open schooling is eligible for admission if he had regular schooling up to SSLC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Prasanna, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the approval list dated 3.11.2015 issued by the Karnataka State Law University (respondent No.2) which denied approval of his admission to the 3-year law course at Seth Shankarlal Law College, Kalaburagi. The University refused approval on the ground that the petitioner had passed his 2-year Pre-University Course (PUC) either as a private student or through the National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS), which was not considered as regular mode. The petitioner contended that he had studied standards 1 to 10 as a regular student and secured SSLC from the Karnataka Secondary Education Examination Board, and that his PUC was through correspondence. The court examined the relevant rules and found that there was no specific prohibition against open schooling for PUC in the Bar Council of India Rules or University regulations. The court held that since the petitioner had a regular school background up to SSLC, the denial of admission was unjustified. The court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned approval list insofar as it related to the petitioner, and directed the University to approve his admission. The judgment was delivered by Justice B.S. Patil on 4th October 2016.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Admission to Law Course - Eligibility - Open Schooling - Bar Council of India Rules - The issue was whether a student who passed PUC through correspondence/open schooling is eligible for 3-year law course. The court held that since the student had studied standards 1 to 10 as a regular student and passed SSLC from a regular board, the requirement of 'regular mode' for PUC was not mandatory. The court allowed the petition and directed the University to approve the admission. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a student who has passed 2 years Pre-University Course (PUC) through correspondence/open schooling is eligible for admission to a 3-year law course.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned approval list dated 3.11.2015 insofar as it relates to the petitioner, and directed the University to approve the petitioner's admission to the 3-year law course.

Law Points

  • Eligibility for 3-year law course
  • Open schooling PUC
  • Regular mode of education
  • Bar Council of India Rules
  • Karnataka State Law University regulations
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (10) 28

W.P.No.206192/2015 (EDN-AD)

2016-10-04

B.S. Patil

Sri. Rajesh Doddamani (for petitioner), Sri. Ashok S. Kinagi (for R-1), Shri Shivakumar Malipatil (for R-2)

Prasanna S/o Mallikarjun Balegowda

The Principal, Seth Shankarlal Law College, Kalaburagi and The Registrar, Karnataka State Law University, Hubballi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging denial of approval for admission to 3-year law course.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the approval list dated 3.11.2015 insofar as it relates to the petitioner and direction to approve his admission.

Filing Reason

The University refused to approve the petitioner's admission on the ground that he passed PUC through correspondence/open schooling.

Issues

Whether a student who passed PUC through correspondence/open schooling is eligible for admission to a 3-year law course.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he had regular schooling up to SSLC and that there was no bar against open schooling for PUC. Respondents contended that the petitioner's PUC was not through regular mode, making him ineligible.

Ratio Decidendi

A student who has studied standards 1 to 10 as a regular student and passed SSLC from a regular board is eligible for admission to a 3-year law course even if he passed PUC through correspondence/open schooling, as there is no specific prohibition in the rules.

Judgment Excerpts

Question that falls for consideration in this writ petition is with regard to eligibility of petitioner to prosecute his studies in 3 year law course. In the instant case, it is not in dispute that petitioner has studied standard 1 to 10 as a regular student and has secured S.S.L.C. marks card issued by the Karnataka Secondary Education Examination Board.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the approval list dated 3.11.2015 issued by the Karnataka State Law University. The petition was heard and disposed of on 4.10.2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Caste Scrutiny Committee to Decide Caste Claim Within Six Months and Protects Petitioner's Services Pending Decision. The court ordered time-bound decision of caste claim by Scrutiny Committee and interim protection of servi...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Student's Admission in 3-Year Law Course Despite Open Schooling PUC. The court held that a student who passed PUC through correspondence/open schooling is eligible for admission if he had regular schooling up to SSLC.