Search Results for "Rule 28A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Rule 28A"

58 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Regarding Lok Adalat Award as Basis for Compensation Redetermination. Court Held That Lok Adalat Award Under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Does Not Qualify as Determination by 'Court' Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as It Is Based on Compromise and Lacks Adjudicatory Function.

3 Feb 2022

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in relation to Awards p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Disposal of Section 28A Applications Despite Pending Appeals in Land Acquisition Case. Landowners' Applications for Redetermination of Compensation Cannot Be Kept Pending Solely Due to Pendency of State's Appeals Against Reference Court Award.

7 Feb 2014

The petitioners were owners of lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. An award under Section 11 was made in 1988. In 1999, they filed ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Redetermination Petition for Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' application under Section 28A rejected as they failed to file within prescribed period and did not obtain reference under Section 18.

24 Feb 2014

The petitioners, three agriculturists, challenged an order dated 30.6.2011 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer, Nanded, rejecting their application...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions for Agricultural Land in Nagpur — Held That Market Value Must Be Determined Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Based on Potential Use and Comparable Sales. The court directed reassessment of compensation considering industrial potential and comparable sales.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners from Takalghat, Hingna, Nagpur, challenging the compensation awarded by the Spe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Payment of Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Directs Payment Upon Furnishing Bank Guarantee Despite Pending Appeal by Acquiring Body.

14 Feb 2014

The petitioners, owners of land acquired for the Neera Deoghar Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, sought a writ of mandamus directing the S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Section 28A Application in Land Acquisition Case — Petitioner Failed to Pursue Reference Under Section 18 Diligently, Resulting in Dismissal for Non-Payment of Court Fees.

13 Feb 2017

The petitioner, Shri Annasaheb Tulsiram Kharat, owned land at Village Mirgavan, Taluka Karmala, District Solapur, which was acquired for the Sina-Kole...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Appeal to SEBI in Securities Law Case — Interim Relief Denied as Trial Court's Discharge Order Not Shown to be Manifestly Illegal. SEBI's Application for Leave to Appeal Under Section 22 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 Against Discharge of Accused in Criminal Complaint for Violation of Securities Laws.

24 Dec 2025

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) filed an application for leave to appeal against an order of the trial court discharging Mahendra Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Section 28A Application for Enhanced Compensation — Land Acquisition Officer's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Limitation Provisions. The court held that the application under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was within limitation and the rejection without hearing violated natural justice.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioners, legal heirs of Balwant Kannav, challenged the order dated 31.03.1999 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Yavatmal, reject...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 28A Limitation in Land Acquisition Act — Three-Month Period for Redetermination of Compensation Held Constitutional. The court ruled that the three-month limitation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is reasonable and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution, as the classification between award acceptors and Section 18 reference seekers is valid.

24 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Surendrakumar Madhusudan Mor, owned land bearing Gat No.128 admeasuring 5.27 hectares at mouza Pimpri (Hatgaon), Taluka and District Y...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Reconsideration of Section 28A Application Without Certified Copy in Land Acquisition Case. The court held that the requirement of certified copy is directory and the authority should have given an opportunity to produce it.

23 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Tukaram Janaba Patil, aged 96, owned agricultural lands in Gut no.1274 and 1277 at Village Kalkundri, Taluka Chandgad, District Kolhap...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)