Search Results for "Rule 27(1)"

575 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 575 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Order Restoring Ex-Parte Regular Appeal Filed by Defendant in Title Suit. Presumption of Service Under Section 27 of General Clauses Act, 1897 Stands Unrebutted as Power of Attorney Holder Lacked Personal Knowledge to Lead Evidence.

The Civil Revision Petition arose out of a title suit (O.S. No. 466/2011) filed by one Smt. Akkayamma seeking declaration of title and permanent injun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witness in Civil Suit for Cross-Examination on Newly Discovered Documents — Order 18 Rule 17 CPC. Petitioner/Defendant Granted Opportunity to Cross-Examine Plaintiff's Witness on Documents Discovered After Examination.

The petitioner, defendant no. 2 in Regular Civil Suit No. 66 of 2009, challenged the order of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kadegaon, reject...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Register Relinquishment Deed Due to Name Discrepancy. Court Directs Registration Subject to Compliance with Rule 55A of Tamil Nadu Registration Rules, 2000 and Production of Identity Certificate.

The petitioner, Mohammed Assan, and his brother K.Mubarak @ Abdul Mubarak jointly purchased landed property in Tenkasi Village through a registered sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010159832015_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Convicts Directors for Default in Filing Statement of Affairs Under Section 454(5) of Companies Act, 1956 — Failure to Submit Statement Despite Repeated Court Orders and Notices Constitutes Offence Without Reasonable Excuse.

The Official Liquidator of M/s. Geeta Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. filed a complaint under Section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 against four accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to DRAT Order Upholding DRT Dismissal of Recall of Ex-Parte Decree in Debt Recovery Proceedings. Petitioners Contend Non-Service of Summons and Advocate's Mere Filing of Vakalatnama Cannot Waive Service, Which Is Essential for Written Statement.

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applicant's Challenge to Fugitive Economic Offender Proceedings — Procedural Direction to Split Hearing Not Interfered With. Mandatory Compliance with Section 4(2) and Section 10(2) of Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 Not Required at Initial Stage of Declaration.

The applicant, Mehul Choksi, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging an order dated 31 Januar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.853 OF 2012

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010026042017_1

...