Search Results for "Rule 222"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Rule 222"

657 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 657 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking to Restrain Former Additional Judges from Practicing in Lower Courts. Article 220 of the Constitution does not apply to Additional Judges who resigned before confirmation, as they are not 'permanent Judges' within the meaning of the provision.

2 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Nitin Shankar Deshpande, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court seeking to restrain Respondents 5 to 9, who were ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Registration Fee Dispute — Rule 55A of MP Motor Vehicles Rules Valid. State can charge separate fee for reserved registration numbers under Section 41(6) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

26 Aug 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court judgment that had quashed Rule 55A of the Madhya Prad...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Husband's and Wife's Cross-Writ Petitions, Quashing Principal District Judge's Order That Exceeded Inherent Jurisdiction by Reviewing Withdrawal of Appeal. Withdrawal of Appeal Does Not Amount to Withdrawal of Original Petition Decided on Merits, and Res Judicata in Matrimonial Matters Requires Factual Inquiry into Continuing Wrongs.

4 May 2018

The dispute arose from matrimonial proceedings between a husband and wife. The husband filed HMP No.218 of 2009 seeking divorce on grounds of cruelty ...

High Court

Bombay High Court considers rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 and Order XXIII CPC in suit by trustee alleging siphoning of funds from trust. Defendants seek dismissal on grounds of forgery, abuse of process, and frivolous pleadings.

24 Mar 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Deposited Amount in Summary Suit for Recovery of Debt. Plaintiff entitled to withdraw amount deposited by defendant as condition for leave to defend, subject to furnishing security.

9 Mar 2012

The plaintiff, SKF India Ltd., filed a summary suit against the defendant, Banarasi Lal Madan, for recovery of Rs. 1,28,80,060.87 based on invoices, a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Validity of Rule 9(3)(b) of Chartered Accountants' Rules, 2007. The Court upheld the Board of Discipline's power to refer a matter to the Disciplinary Committee under Rule 9(3)(b), finding it consistent with Section 21A(4) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and within the rule-making authority under Section 29A.

8 Feb 2024

The dispute originated from a complaint filed by Bank of Rajasthan Limited against M/s Ramesh C. Agrawal & Co., an audit firm engaged to conduct audit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defendant to Produce Documents in Civil Suit Despite Delay — Liberal Approach to Amendment of Pleadings Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. Pre-trial stage application for production of documents should be liberally allowed to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

13 Apr 2005

The petitioner, M/s. HCL Ltd., was the defendant in Special Civil Suit No.222/93/III pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Marga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Recovery Proceedings and Civil Imprisonment Order for Non-Payment of Dues. Recovery Officer's Order for Arrest and Detention of Defaulter Under Section 28A of SEBI Act, 1992 Upheld as Valid Exercise of Powers.

10 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Vinod Hinigorani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of orders dated 18.12....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — No Fraud or Collusion Found. Consent Terms Recorded in Suit for Specific Performance of Share Purchase Agreement Were Valid and Binding, Not Vitiated by Fraud or Misrepresentation Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

11 Mar 2020

The judgment arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the original defendants (applicants) in a commercial suit seeking to set aside a consent decree d...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Production of Documents in Commercial Suit — Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC Does Not Mandate Filing of Documents Only at First Hearing. The court held that the trial court's discretion to allow late production of documents under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC was valid and did not cause prejudice to the defendant.

10 Jun 2025

The petitioner, M/S. JSM Corporation Private Limited, was the defendant in Commercial Original Suit No.835 of 2023 filed by the respondents, M/S. Brun...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)