Search Results for "Rule 10(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Rule 10(3)"

1903 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1903 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of APMC Chairman Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act, 1963. Petitioner Argues That District Deputy Registrar Lacked Jurisdiction to Decide Rule 10(2) Disqualification Because Only Rule 10(3) Powers Were Delegated by Notification Dated 12.02.2020.

26 Sep 2025

The litigation arose from the disqualification of the petitioner, who was the Chairman and a member of Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Udgir, r...

High Court

Madras High Court Upholds Single Judge's Rejection of Stay Applications in Civil Suits, Holding Section 151 CPC Cannot Override Specific Provisions. Stay of 2013 and 2016 Specific Performance Suits Was Denied as Section 10 CPC Requires Prior Suit and to Prevent Abuse of Process.

24 Mar 2025

The appeals arose from the rejection of applications filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking stay of two civil suits (C....

High Court

NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018

27 Feb 2019

...

High Court

KAHC010028642011_1

23 Sep 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order in Execution Proceedings; Permits Power of Attorney Holder to Argue. Execution of Decree for Possession in Specific Performance Suit Involves Third Party Rights.

7 Oct 2005

This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent read with Order XXI Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenged the order of a learned...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Execution Order in Section 6 Specific Relief Act Suit — Bar Under Section 6(3) Does Not Apply to Execution Proceedings Under Order XXI CPC. Appeal Under Order XXI Rule 103 CPC Held Maintainable as Execution Order Is Not a Decree in the Suit.

27 Sep 2011

The appellant, an obstructionist, challenged a judgment and order dated 7 December 2009 passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, which made absolute a ...

High Court

KAHC010259352010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Applications for Deletion of Defendants. The Court Examines Whether Directors and Former Employees Are Necessary Parties in a Suit for Breach of Contract Under Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

22 Jan 2026

The matter concerns a writ petition filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Rejection of Obstruction Application in Execution Proceedings. Execution Court Dismissed Application Under Order XXI Rule 97 Without Enquiry, Allegedly Violating Order XXI Rule 101 CPC.

13 Dec 2024

The petitioner, a third party objecting to the execution of a decree for vacant possession, challenged the order of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Common Question of Law in Consolidated Commercial Suits and Interim Applications. The Court Interprets Provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 in the Context of Multiple Suits Involving Banking, Media, and Other Commercial Disputes.

27 Feb 2019

...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)