Search Results for "Road Widening Area"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds BBMP Circular Requiring NOC for Building Plan Sanction on Sites Formed Prior to 1965. Circular dated 29.02.2016 held valid under Section 321 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 and Article 300-A of Constitution of India.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging a circular dated 29.02.2016 issued by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). The c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies High Powered Committee Recommendations in Chardham Highway Project Case to Balance Development and Environmental Protection. The court held that widening of highways in ecologically sensitive Himalayan region must be subject to strict environmental safeguards and monitoring.

The case concerns the Chardham Mahamarg Vikas Pariyojna, a project by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways to widen approximately 900 km of nat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Nagpur Improvement Trust Challenging High Court Order Setting Aside Demolition Notice. Internal Road Not Shown in Development Plan Under MRTP Act Cannot Be Implemented Despite Earlier Scheme Under NIT Act.

The case involves a dispute over a 15-metre internal road proposed under a Town Planning Scheme (the 'Abhyankar Road Widening and Buty Mahal Street Sc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Property Dispute Over Road Widening Compensation. Promise to Sanction Additional FSI Held Not Binding Without Consideration and Formal Approval.

The Thane Municipal Corporation (appellant) appealed against a judgment and decree dated 10.3.2005 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Thane in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Additional FSI Grant Under DCR Regulation 33(1) — Petitioner's Lack of Locus Standi and Failure to Establish Public Wrong Leads to Dismissal of Petition Seeking to Protect Mill Workers' Housing Rights.

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, claiming to be a social activist and environmentalist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Corrigendum for Non-Existent Road — Adding New Purpose Without Fresh Notification Invalid Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land Acquisition Officer's Report Under Section 5A Recommending Dropping Acquisition Binding on Government.

The petitioners, Silvestre D' Souza and his wife Apolita D' Souza, purchased parts of a property in Santa Cruz, Goa, including a dwelling house. They ...