Search Results for "RERA Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "RERA Act"

47 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in RERA Execution Case, Holding Order XXI Rule 32(5) CPC Applicable. The court set aside the Appellate Tribunal's order disallowing amendment to execution applications seeking construction by decree holders at promoter's cost.

24 Jun 2026

The case involves five second appeals filed by allottees (Rajan Chandiramani, Jagruti Parikh and Anr., Priyanka Waghela, Srichand Makhija, and Jayesh ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Delayed Possession Case, Upholds Allottees' Right to Interest. Section 18 of RERA Overrides Section 55 of Contract Act; Acceptance of Delayed Possession Does Not Waive Right to Compensation.

18 Jun 2026

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against the judgment of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

18 Jun 2026

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in RERA Case for Delay in Possession — Promoter Liable for Interest Under Section 18 of RERA Act, 2016. The court restored the order of TN RERA directing the promoter to pay interest for delay in handing over possession of flat and club house facilities.

10 Jan 2025

The appellant, a retired General Manager of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, entered into a Memorandum of Agreement on 30.07.2011 with the respon...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Real Estate Dispute — RERA Bar Under Section 79 Applies to Civil Suits for Possession and Damages. The court held that a civil suit for possession and damages against a developer is barred by Section 79 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, as the dispute falls within the purview of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority.

20 Dec 2024

The case involves a dispute between M/s H.M. Infra Tech Pvt. Ltd. (formerly a partnership firm) and the H.M. Tamborine Apartments Owners Association a...

High Court

Disputes Over Property Transaction Examining Jurisdiction, Admissions, and Legal Implications Under CPC and RERA

14 Jun 2024

Disputes over a property transaction. It examines arguments made by both parties concerning jurisdiction, admissions, and the application of legal pro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Developer in Possession Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 100 CPC. Suits for possession based on title and prior possession were decreed; no substantial question of law arose.

17 Sep 2019

The appellant, M/s. Samruddhi Developers, a partnership firm, filed four second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Lavasa Corporation's Second Appeals Against RERA Orders, Holding That RERA Has No Jurisdiction Over Complaints Filed Before Its Establishment. The Court ruled that the Real Estate Regulatory Authority cannot entertain complaints regarding agreements executed prior to the commencement of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

7 Aug 2018

The judgment involves three second appeals filed by Lavasa Corporation Limited against orders of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and the A...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeals Challenging Admission of Section 7 Application by Allottees Against Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal upheld the NCLT order allowing impleadment of allottees and admitting the insolvency petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as default was established.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two appeals filed against an order dated 04.03.2024 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi Principal B...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)