Search Results for "Protected Zone"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "Protected Zone"

194 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 194 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Invalidates Post Facto CRZ Clearance Policy Issued by Union Government. “Environmental Law Cannot Endorse Post Facto Approvals”

24 Sep 2024

The Bombay High Court addressed the legality of an Office Memorandum issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change, which allowed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Bans Mining in Eco-Sensitive Zones Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Minimum 1 km Buffer Zone Mandated to Protect Forest Resources and Wildlife Habitat Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Jun 2022

This judgment arises from a series of interlocutory applications in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India public interest litigati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Stone Quarry Lease Holders Against NGT Order Prohibiting Mining in Elephant Corridor. The Court upheld the National Green Tribunal's directions to ban mining activities in the Similipal-Hadagarh-Kuldiha-Similipal elephant corridor and to complete the process for declaring a conservation reserve under Section 36 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, based on environmental and wildlife conservation concerns.

2 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from an original application filed by Rural Organisation for Social Empowerment before the National Green Tribunal, seeking cancella...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Single Judge Order Upholding Endorsement for Unauthorized Construction in Hampi World Heritage Area. Construction of Resort Without Approval from Heritage Authority Violates Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and Hampi World Heritage Area Management Authority Act, 2002.

29 Jun 2020

The appellant, Sri. Lakshmi Golden Beach Resort, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court challenging an e...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Demolition of Commercial Structures in Protected Area of Virupapura Gaddi, Hampi. Constructions in Protected Area Declared Under Mysore Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1961 Are Illegal and Subject to Demolition by Hampi World Heritage Area Management Authority.

11 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by owners of restaurants, guest houses, and other commercial establishments in Virupapura Gaddi, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Developer Challenging Quashing of Environmental Clearance for Housing Project Near Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary. Project Located in Catchment Area of Sukhna Lake Requires Central Government Clearance Under Category 'A' of EIA Notification.

5 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Tata Housing Development Company Ltd. (Tata HDCL) against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Aarey Colony Development as Forest Land — Held That Aarey Colony Is Not a Forest Under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and That the State Government Has Discretion to Use Land for Public Purposes. The court ruled that the dictionary meaning of 'forest' does not apply to Aarey Colony, and the petitioners failed to establish that it is a forest requiring prior approval under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

4 Oct 2019

The petitioners, Vanashakti (a public trust) and four individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds CRZ Violations in Maradu Municipality Construction Case — Coastal Zone Management Authority's Powers Affirmed. Construction in CRZ-III No Development Zone Without Prior Concurrence of Authority Violates Environment Protection Act, 1986 and CRZ Notification 1991.

8 May 2019

The appeals were filed by the Kerala State Coastal Zone Management Authority (KCZMA) against the judgment of the Kerala High Court which had allowed w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NGT Directions on Buffer Zones for Lakes and Rajakaluves in Bangalore — Environmental Protection Prevails Over Development Rights. The Court held that the NGT's directions for buffer zones of 75 meters around lakes and 25-50 meters around Rajakaluves are valid and must be implemented prospectively, rejecting retrospective application.

5 Mar 2019

The case involves multiple appeals under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, challenging orders of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for Power Project Under MID Act and Rehabilitation Act — Acquisition Held Valid for Public Purpose of Augmenting Power Supply. The court upheld the notifications under Sections 32 and 33 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 and Sections 11, 13, 14 of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 for acquisition of agricultural land for a 1600 MW coastal power plant.

4 Apr 2012

The petitioners, residents of Taluka Alibag, District Raigad, challenged the acquisition of their agricultural lands for a 1600 MW Coastal Power Plant...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)