Search Results for "PAAA"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "PAAA"

34 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioner in Section 9 Arbitration Petition to Obtain Interim Measures for Redevelopment of Cooperative Housing Society. Court Directed Court Receiver to Execute Tripartite Agreements for Two Disputed Flats Upon Demonstrating Pari Passu Treatment Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2025

This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a Development Agreement dated July 31, 2024 executed between th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Award in Property Dispute — Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Allowed on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the arbitrator's computation of amounts and interest under clause 9 of the Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements was patently illegal and contrary to the terms of the contract.

23 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Dhiraj Lakhamashi Shah and another, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Section 9 Order Directing Handover of Redeveloped Flat and Transit Benefits to Occupant in Possession. Court Reiterates Principle that Redevelopment Cannot Be Used to Evict Occupant and that the Person Dishoused Must Receive Transit Rent and Be Put Back in Possession of New Flat Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

24 Jun 2025

The dispute centered on Flat No. 12 in Spectrum building, Khar, Mumbai, which was undergoing redevelopment. The flat was occupied by Leena, wife of Ro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Arbitrability of Disputes Between Developer and Non-Signatory Member of Cooperative Society Under Development Agreement. Issue Involves Permissibility of Invoking Arbitration Clause Against Dissenting Member Not Party to Agreement.

6 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from the redevelopment of a cooperative society's building in Mumbai. The applicant, a developer, entered into a Development Agreeme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reviews Appeals Against Dismissal of Section 9 Petition for Interim Measures in Redevelopment Dispute. Non-Signatories to Development Agreement Cannot Be Directed to Vacate Premises Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as They Are Not Bound by Agreement.

1 Jul 2025

The matter arose from a redevelopment dispute concerning Poddar Apartment, a building comprising ground plus four upper floors with 30 flats, 44 shops...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Housing Society from Executing Development Agreement with New Developer Pending Arbitration. Court Holds That Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Injury Favor Protection of Developer's Rights Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

24 Apr 2026

The Petitioner, M/s. Pioneer Constructions, filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

High Court

ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026

17 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Lack of Compelling Material and Non-Application of Mind. Detention order under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider that the petitioner was already in judicial custody and there was no credible material to show likelihood of release and resumption of dangerous activities.

19 Jun 2021

The petitioner, Vijay Rajendra Patil, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 (MPDA Act) by an...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes DRAT Order Imposing Pre-deposit on Tenant Under SARFAESI Act -- Petitioner, Neither Borrower Nor Guarantor, Not Required to Deposit 40% for Appeal -- Appeal Revived and Restored for Merits Consideration Without Pre-deposit

20 Jan 2026

The Petitioner, a tenant in a redeveloped building, challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (DRAT, Mumbai) that required h...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition by Developer Against Society in Redevelopment Dispute — Interim Injunction Granted to Protect Developer's Rights Pending Arbitration. The court held that the developer had a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Sep 2023

The judgment concerns three cross-petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from a dispute between a developer,...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)