Search Results for "Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Zilla Parishad in Reinstatement Case — Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction to Reinstate Teacher Under Section 24 of Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947. Suit Also Barred by Limitation Under Section 280 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The case involves a Second Appeal by the Zilla Parishad, Solapur, against a judgment of the District Court which had confirmed the Civil Court's decre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Assistant Teacher Challenging Dismissal Without Inquiry. Dismissal Order Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice and Service Rules.

The petitioner, Khizer Salim Mirza, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher with the Zilla Parishad, Beed. He was dismissed from service by order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension Order for Non-Compliance with Rule 3 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishad District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964. Suspension Invalid as Disciplinary Proceeding Not Contemplated or Pending at Time of Order.

The Petitioner, Sunita Chandrakant Kalekar, was working as an Assistant Teacher in a Primary School run by the Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur. On 28th June,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Teacher Convicted for Abetment of Suicide — Conviction for Offence Involving Moral Turpitude Justifies Dismissal Under Rule 9(1) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964

The petitioner, Sau. Sandhya w/o Anil Deshmukh, was an Assistant Teacher employed with Panchayat Samiti, Chandur Railway, under the Zilla Parishad, Am...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Service Matter Challenging Withholding of Increments Without Enquiry. Major Penalty of Permanently Withholding Increments Requires Departmental Enquiry Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Narendra Motiram Bodkhe, an employee of Zilla Parishad, Wardha, challenged the order dated 9.8.1994 passed by the Chief Executive Offi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Punishment of Withholding Increments Without Departmental Enquiry. Punishment of permanently withholding two increments is a major penalty requiring a formal departmental enquiry under service rules.

The petitioner, Narendra s/o Motiram Bodkhe, a government servant, challenged the order dated 9.8.1994 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Re-Medical Examination Order for Compassionate Appointment Employee with Disability. Direction to undergo re-medical examination after 18 years of service without any change in condition is arbitrary and violative of natural justice.

The petitioner, Maheshkumar Balasaheb Naik, was appointed as a Junior Assistant in 1996 on compassionate grounds after his father's death while in ser...