Search Results for "MLR Code"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "MLR Code"

48 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Additional Commissioner's Orders in Gram Panchayat Disqualification Appeals. Delegation of Powers Under Section 13(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Remains Valid Despite Amendment to Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

12 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Amitkumar Bankar, challenged orders of the Additional Commissioner dated 18.01.2023 that set aside the Collector's disqualification of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Seizure and Fine in Minor Mineral Transport Case — Tractor Carrying Murum for Filling Potholes Not Illegal Mining. Use of Tractor for Personal Purpose Without Royalty Receipt Does Not Attract Penalty Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

14 Dec 2022

The petitioners, Prakash Tumdu Chaudhari and Sujit Prakash Gujrati, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition — Petitioner Company Fails to Establish Title Over Disputed Land as Revenue Records Show Government Ownership. The court held that revenue entries are prima facie evidence of title and disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.

5 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Viraj Profiles Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of land by the State of Maharashtra under the Maharashtra Land ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Revision Order — Minister's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Inordinate Delay. Mutation Entry No.508 dated 17.10.2010 Restored as Revision Under Section 257 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Was Filed After 3 Years Without Notice to Affected Parties.

10 Feb 2021

The petitioners, four brothers (Balkrishna, Gopalkrishna, Vishwanath, and Dattatraya), challenged the judgment and order dated 05.10.2017 passed by th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order Setting Aside Eviction Under Section 59 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The MRT lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against a Tahsildar's eviction order passed under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and the appeal was barred by limitation.

3 Feb 2020

The petitioners, original tenants of the disputed land, challenged the decision of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 26.04.1996, which allo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners' Challenge to SDO Order in Land Revenue Dispute — Appeal Under Section 247 MLR Code Not Maintainable Against Tahsildar's Order Under Section 143(1). The Court held that the remedy against a Tahsildar's order regarding right of way under Section 143(1) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 is a civil suit under Section 143(4), and an appeal under Section 247 is barred.

19 Aug 2015

The petitioners challenged an order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer (SDO) under Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 (MLR Code)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Has No Power to Review Its Own Orders Under Bombay Tenancy Act. The Tribunal's review jurisdiction under Section 315(1) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 is not available for orders passed under Section 76 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

20 Oct 2006

The case involved a reference to a larger bench of the Bombay High Court to determine whether the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal has jurisdiction to rev...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)