Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order Setting Aside Eviction Under Section 59 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The MRT lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against a Tahsildar's eviction order passed under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and the appeal was barred by limitation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, original tenants of the disputed land, challenged the decision of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 26.04.1996, which allowed the appeal of the respondents and set aside the eviction order dated 06.12.1976 passed by the Tahsildar, Amalner, under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The land in dispute admeasures 90 ares and is assigned G.No.105 of village Nanded, Tahsil Amalner. The Tahsildar had passed the eviction order against the respondents, who were allegedly unauthorized occupants. The respondents filed an appeal before the MRT in 1995, nearly 19 years after the eviction order. The MRT allowed the appeal and set aside the eviction order. The petitioners contended that the MRT had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal as the order under Section 59 of the Code is not appealable, and the appeal was barred by limitation. The High Court examined the provisions of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and noted that Section 59 does not provide for an appeal. The only remedy available was revision under Section 257 of the Code, which could be exercised suo motu by the Commissioner or the State Government. The MRT had no appellate jurisdiction over such orders. Additionally, the appeal was filed after an inordinate delay of 19 years without any explanation. The High Court held that the MRT acted without jurisdiction and its order is a nullity. The writ petition was allowed, and the MRT's order was quashed and set aside. The eviction order dated 06.12.1976 was restored.

Headnote

A) Land Revenue - Eviction of Unauthorized Occupant - Section 59 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Jurisdiction of MRT - The Tahsildar passed an eviction order under Section 59 of the Code on 06.12.1976. The MRT entertained an appeal in 1995 and set aside the order. The High Court held that the MRT had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal as the order under Section 59 is not appealable under the Code, and the appeal was grossly delayed without any explanation. (Paras 1-5)

B) Limitation - Appeal before MRT - Delay of 19 years - The appeal was filed in 1995 against an order of 1976. The MRT did not consider the delay or lack of jurisdiction. The High Court held that the MRT acted without jurisdiction and the order is a nullity. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal had jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against the Tahsildar's eviction order passed under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and whether the appeal was barred by limitation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 26.04.1996 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in Revenue Appeal No.(A) 03 of 1995 is quashed and set aside. The eviction order dated 06.12.1976 passed by the Tahsildar, Amalner in Misc. Revenue Application No.284 of 1976 is restored.

Law Points

  • Section 59 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code
  • 1966
  • Eviction of unauthorized occupant
  • Limitation for appeal
  • Suo motu revisional powers
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (02) 19

WRIT PETITION NO.3885 OF 1996

2020-02-03

ROHIT B. DEO

Mr.B.R.Warma for petitioners, Mr.S.D.Kulkarni for Respondents No.01-A to 01-C, Mr.N.T.Bhagat, A.G.P. for Respondents No.2 to 5

Vithal Tanku Kolim (since deceased) through LRs and Sahadu Shankar Koli (since deceased) through LRs

Laxman Gotu Attarde (since deceased) through LRs, State of Maharashtra, Additional Commissioner, Additional Collector, Tahsildar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal setting aside an eviction order passed by the Tahsildar under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought quashing of the MRT's order dated 26.04.1996 and restoration of the eviction order dated 06.12.1976.

Filing Reason

The MRT allowed an appeal against the eviction order without jurisdiction and after gross delay.

Previous Decisions

Tahsildar, Amalner passed eviction order on 06.12.1976 in Misc. Revenue Application No.284 of 1976. MRT set aside that order on 26.04.1996 in Revenue Appeal No.(A) 03 of 1995.

Issues

Whether the MRT had jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against an order passed under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Whether the appeal before the MRT was barred by limitation.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the MRT had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal as Section 59 does not provide for an appeal, and the appeal was filed after 19 years without explanation. Respondents argued that the MRT had jurisdiction and the appeal was maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The MRT had no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against an order passed under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, as no appeal is provided under the Code against such an order. The only remedy is revision under Section 257, which can be exercised suo motu. Additionally, the appeal was grossly delayed by 19 years without any explanation, and the MRT ought not to have entertained it.

Judgment Excerpts

The order dated 06.12.1976 is passed by the Tahsildar in purported exercise of power under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The MRT has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against an order passed under Section 59 of the Code. The appeal was filed in 1995, nearly 19 years after the eviction order, and the MRT did not consider the delay or the question of jurisdiction.

Procedural History

The Tahsildar, Amalner passed an eviction order on 06.12.1976 under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The respondents filed an appeal before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in 1995, which was allowed on 26.04.1996, setting aside the eviction order. The petitioners then filed the present writ petition in 1996 challenging the MRT's order.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966: 59, 257
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Notice under Section 148 issued beyond four years quashed as there was no failure to disclose material facts and the reasons const...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order Setting Aside Eviction Under Section 59 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The MRT lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against a Tahsildar's eviction order passed under Section ...