Search Results for "MHADA Act Section 95-A"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summary Eviction Order Against 80-Year-Old Tenant in MHADA Redevelopment Dispute. Petitioner's Right to Alternate Accommodation Under Section 95A of MHADA Act Upheld as Board Failed to Provide Permanent Rehabilitation Before Eviction.

The petitioner, Sugrabai Gulam Abas Tambawala, an 80-year-old housewife, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MBRRB Notices and Order in Bhendi Bazar Redevelopment Project. Court upholds validity of notices under Section 95A of MHAD Act and order appointing SBUT as developer, finding no violation of natural justice or statutory provisions.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by occupants of Sardharia Building in Bhendi Bazar, Mumbai, challenging actions of the Bombay Building ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Against Plaint Rejection in MHADA Redevelopment Dispute. Tenants Challenge Jurisdiction of Small Causes Court Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act and MHADA Act.

The case involved multiple civil revision applications filed by tenants of Laxmi Building, Mumbai, before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds MHADA's Order for Repairs and Redevelopment of Cessed Building Under Section 95A of MHADA Act. Court Directs Tenants to Pay Increased Rent and Vacate for Redevelopment, Rejecting Challenge to Executive Engineer's Order.

The appellants, eight tenants of a cessed building in Chittaranjan Nagar, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24 April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Tenants Against MHADA in Slum Rehabilitation Disputes — Held That Tenants in Possession Before Cut-Off Date Are Entitled to Rehabilitation Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by tenants against the Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (MHADA) concerning slum rehabilitat...