Search Results for "MCZMA"

28 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Company Seeking Mandamus to Permit Construction of Captive Jetty and Cement Plant in Mangrove Area. Court holds that prior environmental clearances are mandatory and the petitioner cannot circumvent the directions in PIL No.87/2006.

The petitioner, Adani Cementation Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 and part of the Adani Group, filed a writ petition see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging MCZMA's Refusal of CRZ Clearance for Occupancy Certificate. MCZMA cannot refuse clearance on ground of mismatch between DCR 1991 and DCR 1967 when construction was lawfully permitted under DCR 1991.

The petitioner, MRK Enterprises, a partnership firm, owned a property known as 'Amir House' at Colaba, Mumbai. The petitioner sought a Coastal Zone Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows NHAI to Fell Mangroves for Expressway Subject to Compensatory Plantation. National Highway Project of National Importance Permitted with Conditions to Mitigate Ecological Impact in CRZ-IA Area.

The Bombay High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) seeking leave to execute the Vadodara-Mumba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MCGM to Execute Storm Water Pumping Station Upgradation Work Subject to Environmental Compliance. Public Interest Work Permitted Pending Environmental Clearances.

The petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), filed a writ petition seeking permission to execute upgradation work of design, fabric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...