Bombay High Court Allows MCGM to Construct Suction Tank in Mangrove Buffer Zone for Water Supply to Gorai Village. The court directed authorities to consider MCGM's application for permission within four weeks, holding that the project for public water supply could be permitted subject to due process under the Environment Protection Act and CRZ notifications.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus to permit the execution of a project for a suction tank near Gorai Village to provide adequate water supply. The project site, located at CTS No. 1145 (Survey No. 265/A), is partly within a 50-meter mangrove buffer zone. The petition arose from observations in a previous judgment in PIL No. 87 of 2006 (Bombay Environment Action Group v. State of Maharashtra), which had directed that no construction be allowed in mangrove buffer zones without prior clearance. MCGM argued that the project was essential for public water supply and that it had applied for necessary permissions. The court considered whether the project could proceed without prior CRZ clearance. It noted that the project was for a public utility and that the authorities had not yet decided on MCGM's application. The court directed the respondent authorities to consider MCGM's application for permission within four weeks, and restrained MCGM from carrying out any construction until such permission was granted. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Environmental Law - Coastal Regulation Zone - Mangrove Buffer Zone - Public Interest - The court considered whether a municipal corporation could construct a suction tank for water supply within a 50-meter mangrove buffer zone without prior CRZ clearance. The court held that the project, being for public water supply, was permissible subject to conditions and that the authorities must consider the application expeditiously. (Paras 1-10)

B) Constitutional Law - Article 226 - Mandamus - The court examined the maintainability of a writ petition seeking mandamus to permit construction in a mangrove buffer zone. The court held that mandamus could be issued to direct authorities to consider the application, but not to grant permission without due process. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai can be permitted to construct a suction tank for water supply within a 50-meter mangrove buffer zone, and whether the project requires prior clearance from the Coastal Regulation Zone authorities.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court disposed of the petition directing the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner's application for permission to construct the suction tank within four weeks. The petitioner was restrained from carrying out any construction until permission is granted. The petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Environmental Law
  • Coastal Regulation Zone
  • Mangrove Buffer Zone
  • Public Interest
  • Water Supply
  • Mandamus
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (01) 221

WRIT PETITION NO. 4138 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4665 OF 2022

2023-02-24

R. D. Dhanuka, M. M. Sathaye

2023:BHC-OS:1455-DB

Mr. Saket Mone a/w Ms. Shilpa Redkar and Mr. Subit Chakrabarti for Petitioner; Mr. Rui Rodrigues a/w Mr. N.R. Prajapati for Respondent No. 1; Ms. Jaya Bagwe for Respondent No. 2/MCZMA; Mr. Amit Shastri, AGP for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5; Ms. Sheetal Shah i/by M/s. Mehta and Girdharlal for Respondent No. 6

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Union of India, Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority, State of Maharashtra, Chief Conservator of Forest (Mangrove Cell), State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority, Maharashtra, Bombay Environment Action Group (BEAG)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to permit construction of a suction tank for water supply in a mangrove buffer zone.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner (MCGM) sought a writ of mandamus directing respondent authorities to permit execution of the suction tank project near Gorai Village.

Filing Reason

The project site is partly within a 50-meter mangrove buffer zone, and the petitioner needed permission from authorities, which had not been granted, leading to the filing of the petition.

Previous Decisions

This Court in PIL No. 87 of 2006 (BEAG's case) vide judgment dated 17th September 2018 at paragraph 83(viii) recorded findings that no construction should be allowed in mangrove buffer zones without prior clearance.

Issues

Whether the MCGM can be permitted to construct a suction tank in a mangrove buffer zone without prior CRZ clearance. Whether the court can issue a mandamus to direct authorities to grant permission for the project.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the project is essential for providing potable water to citizens of Gorai Village and that the land is owned by the Government of Maharashtra. Respondents argued that the project requires prior clearance from the Coastal Zone Management Authority and other environmental authorities.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that while a mandamus can be issued to direct authorities to consider an application for permission, it cannot compel the grant of permission without due process. The project, being for public water supply, is in public interest, but must comply with environmental regulations.

Judgment Excerpts

By this Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner (Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai) is seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent authorities to permit the Petitioner to execute a project of proposed suction tank for providing adequate water supply to citizens around Gorai Village. It is the case of the Petitioner that it is a statutory body established under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 tasked with various duties including providing potable water to citizens residing within its jurisdiction.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 2022. It was heard on 15th February 2023 and judgment pronounced on 24th February 2023. The petition was disposed of with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888:
  • Environment Protection Act, 1986:
  • Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Clubbing of Three Cheque Dishonour Complaints Under Section 138 NI Act for Joint Trial. Common Transaction and Same Parties Justify Consolidation to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Panchayat No Confidence Motion Case Due to Invalid Membership Based on Caste Certificate Non-Compliance. Member's Failure to Submit Validity Certificate Within Mandatory Period Under Section 10-1A of Maharashtra Vill...