Search Results for "Khatha deletion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Khatha deletion"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Corrects High Court's Erroneous Observations in Property Title Dispute Under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Court held that mischaracterization of claims and previous orders in the judgment required correction to prevent prejudice in pending civil proceedings, as the High Court had inverted the respondent's claim and misstated the effect of a prior order regarding property identity.

16 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from two orders of the High Court of Karnataka: a judgment dated 23.02.2024 in CRP No.131 of 2022 and an order dated 22.03.2024 dismi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Khata Transfer in Property Dispute — BBMP Endorsement Quashed for Disregarding Registered Release Deed. Release Deed Must Be Given Effect Under Section 149 of BBMP Act; Writ of Mandamus Issued to Bring Khata in Conformity.

23 Nov 2023

The petitioner, Sharmada B K, a practicing dentist, along with her parents, purchased site No.31 carved out of Sy.No.123 and 131 (old No.71) in Kathri...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suo Motu Revision Order Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Initiated After 48 Years — Unreasonable Delay and Lack of Notice Vitiate Proceedings. The court held that the power of suo motu revision must be exercised within a reasonable period, and a delay of 48 years is unreasonable; further, the order passed without notice to the grantee violates natural justice and is void.

9 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Mr. Ramakrishna M, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Removing Land Entries in Victimization Case — Dual Stand by Government Authorities Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act and SC/ST Act Leads to Setting Aside of Impugned Order. The court held that the petitioner was victimized by the contradictory stands of the Assistant Commissioner under the Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act, 1978 and the Deputy Commissioner under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and quashed the order directing removal of entries.

17 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Krishnappa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an order dated 10.11.2011 passed by ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Failure to Prove Title and Possession. Suit for declaration of title and injunction dismissed as plaintiff failed to establish ownership and possession over suit property; appellate court affirms trial court's findings on lack of evidence.

23 Aug 2019

The appellant, Sri N. Krishnamurthy, filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of suit property against the Corporatio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Restoration of Khatha and Acceptance of Property Tax. Deletion of Khatha Without Notice Violates Natural Justice Under Section 108-A of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

26 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Mr. Jai M. Patil, is the owner of Flat No.S-3, measuring 2000 sq. ft., situated on the second floor of 'Pratham Enclave' apartment in ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Second Appeal in Execution Dispute Over Attached Property — Sale Agreement Prior to Attachment Confers Right to Resist Execution Under Order XXI Rules 58 and 97 CPC. The Court held that attachment before judgment does not create any right or title, and a prior sale agreement coupled with possession gives the purchaser a right to object to execution.

13 Apr 2015

The appellant, S.K. Gangadhara, entered into a registered sale agreement on 01.07.2004 for the purchase of a house property from Sri B.M. Krishna. The...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenges by Landowners in KIADB Proceedings — Preliminary Notification Under Section 28(1) of KIAD Act Not Quashed Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Section 28(2) and Section 28(4). The court held that the petitioners were guilty of delay and laches and had no locus standi to challenge the acquisition after the final notification was issued.

12 Nov 2013

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)