High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Restoration of Khatha and Acceptance of Property Tax. Deletion of Khatha Without Notice Violates Natural Justice Under Section 108-A of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mr. Jai M. Patil, is the owner of Flat No.S-3, measuring 2000 sq. ft., situated on the second floor of 'Pratham Enclave' apartment in Site Nos.11 and 27, MLA Layout, Lottegollahalli, Ward No.100/Sanjaynagar, Bengaluru. He filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents, the Commissioner of Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (now Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike) and the Assistant Revenue Officer, to restore the Khatha of the schedule property in Khatha No.11 (PID No.100-591-11/A) to enable him to pay property tax for the years 2014-15. The petitioner had purchased the flat and had been regularly paying annual property tax under Section 108-A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. He was issued an 'A' Khata certificate on 10/03/2010. However, when he attempted to pay the tax for 2014-15, he was informed that his Khatha had been deleted from the records. The petitioner contended that the deletion was done without any notice or opportunity of hearing, and that he was not aware of any reason for such deletion. The respondents did not file any objections or appear to contest the petition. The Court observed that the deletion of Khatha without notice was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The Court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to restore the Khatha and accept the property tax for 2014-15 within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order. The Court also noted that the respondents were at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law after giving due notice to the petitioner, if any valid reason existed for deletion.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Property Tax - Khatha Deletion - Natural Justice - Section 108-A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 - The petitioner, owner of a flat, was issued an 'A' Khata certificate on 10/03/2010 and had been regularly paying property tax. The BBMP deleted the Khatha from its records without any notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The Court held that such deletion without notice is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The Court directed the respondents to restore the Khatha and accept the property tax for the year 2014-15 within four weeks. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the deletion of Khatha from the records of the Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) without notice to the petitioner is valid and whether the petitioner is entitled to restoration of Khatha to enable payment of property tax.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to restore the Khatha of the schedule property and accept the property tax for the year 2014-15 within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order. The respondents are at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law after giving due notice to the petitioner, if any valid reason existed for deletion.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Property tax
  • Khatha restoration
  • Mandamus
  • Section 108-A Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act
  • 1976
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (10) 10

Writ Petition No.10976/2015 (LB-BMP)

2016-10-26

Dr. Vineet Kothari

Ms. Sreedevi K.B. for Petitioner, Mr. K.V. Mohan Kumar for Respondents 1 & 2

Mr. Jai M. Patil

The Commissioner, Bangalore Mahanagara Palike & Another

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking restoration of Khatha and acceptance of property tax.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to restore Khatha of schedule property to enable payment of property tax for 2014-15.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's Khatha was deleted from BBMP records without notice, preventing him from paying property tax.

Issues

Whether deletion of Khatha without notice to the petitioner is valid? Whether petitioner is entitled to restoration of Khatha to pay property tax?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he was issued 'A' Khata certificate on 10/03/2010 and had been regularly paying property tax under Section 108-A of the Act. Petitioner contended that Khatha was deleted without any notice or opportunity of hearing, which is arbitrary and violative of natural justice. Respondents did not file objections or appear to contest the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

Deletion of Khatha from municipal records without notice to the property owner is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The owner is entitled to restoration of Khatha to enable payment of property tax under Section 108-A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel for the petitioner has urged before the Court that after the purchase of the said Flat by the petitioner, the petitioner has been regular in paying the Annual Property Tax under Section 108-A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976... The respondents have not chosen to file any objections nor they are present before the Court today. The deletion of Khatha without notice to the petitioner is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.10976/2015 under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The petition came up for preliminary hearing in 'B' group on 26-10-2016. The respondents did not file objections or appear. The Court allowed the petition on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976: Section 108-A
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Restoration of Khatha and Acceptance of Property Tax. Deletion of Khatha Without Notice Violates Natural Justice Under Section 108-A of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Minor Student's Admission to First Standard Despite Age Deficiency - Power of Relaxation of 15 Days by Head Master Upheld Under Government Resolution Dated 25 July 2019. The Court held that the Government Resolution dated 18 ...