Search Results for "Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj Act"

36 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Grama Panchayat Delimitation Notification — No Violation of Natural Justice Found in Final Notification Process. Delimitation of Wards Under Section 5 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is a Legislative Function Not Requiring Hearing Before Final Notification.

20 Sep 2021

The petitioners, residents of various Grama Panchayats in Mangaluru Taluk, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Vice President — Motion Valid Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice of Motion Properly Served and Motion Carried by Majority of Members.

26 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Sri R. Chandrahasa, a member of Kesturu Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Comply with Rule 3(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence Against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994. The court held that the requirement of specifying the date of meeting in the notice is mandatory, and non-compliance renders the motion void.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. A notice of no-confidence motion was given by 14 members of the Gram Panchayat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Specify Meeting Date and Time Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory requirement of specifying date and time in the notice was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion invalid.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. Certain members of the Gram Panchayat issued a notice of no-confidence motion ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against President and Vice President of Village Panchayat — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period under Section 49(2) was not complied with as the meeting was held only 4 days after the notice.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mrs. Malathi B Acharya (President) and Mr. Chandrashekar (Vice President) of Bommarabettu Village Panchayat, challenged the no-confid...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Panchayat President and Vice President — Requirement of Prior Notice Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Held Directory. Motion Valid as Substantially Complied With.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mrs. Malathi B Acharya (President) and Mr. Chandrashekar (Vice President) of Bommarabettu Village Panchayat, challenged the no-confid...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion and resolution invalid.

12 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Sri Harisha I.E., was the President of Ichanahally Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against him by the respondents, wh...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Removal of Grama Panchayath President for Violation of Natural Justice — Order Passed Without Proper Enquiry and Opportunity of Hearing. Removal of Elected Representative Under Section 42 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Principles of Natural Justice.

23 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Sri Sathish K., was the President of Grama Panchayath, Ithoor, Sunkatadatte Village, Puttur Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District. He was r...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice Against Grama Panchayat Member for Alleged Irregularity in Sanctioning Construction During Previous Term. Notice Issued After Five-Year Gap Held Unreasonable and Barred by Delay and Laches Under Section 43A of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

30 Nov 2016

The petitioner, B.N. Krupananda, a member of Basavanahalli Grama Panchayat, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Deputy Commissioner to Consider Representations for Division of Panchayat Assets Under Section 118(2) of Karnataka Grama Swaraj and Panchayath Raj Act, 1993. The court deprecated litigation between two Grama Panchayaths over allocation of public funds and assets, holding that the Deputy Commissioner must decide on the division of assets and liabilities as per the statute.

15 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Ayanur Grama Panchayath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Depu...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)