Search Results for "Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Declaration Due to Non-Compliance with Section 90(2) of Finance Act, 1998. Court holds that the Designated Authority must consider the declaration on merits and cannot reject it solely on the ground that the declarant had not paid the tax determined under the Scheme within the prescribed time.

28 Apr 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Swam Mills Ltd., a composite textile mill, was served with 14 show cause notices for recovery of differential duty of approximate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Illegal Appropriation Under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme — Petitioner Entitled to Benefit of KVSS for A.Y. 1987-88 Despite Prior Deposit Under Court Order. The court held that the appropriation of Rs.3,11,206/- by the Tax Recovery Officer towards tax demand for Assessment Year 1987-88 out of Rs.6,00,000/- deposited under High Court order was illegal, and the petitioner is entitled to benefit of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 for the tax arrears of A.Y. 1987-88.

26 Jun 2020

The petitioner, M/s. Kuber Builders, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of KVSS Declaration — Post-Manufacturing Expenses Dispute. The court held that an appeal is pending until the order is communicated to the party, and thus the declaration under Section 95 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 was validly filed.

19 Jan 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Pepsico India Holdings Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing aerated water, soft drinks, and fruit-pulp based drinks, was issu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Rejection of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Declaration in Respect of Wealth Tax Arrears of Deceased Assessee; Appeal Pending Despite Dismissal on Limitation. Court Examines Whether an Appeal Against Refusal to Condone Delay Constitutes a Pending Appeal Under Section 95(i)(c) of Finance (No.2) Act, 1998, Making Declarant Eligible.

25 Oct 2005

The petition arose from the rejection of the petitioner's declarations under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 in respect of the wealth-tax arrears ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tax Determination Under Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme, 1998. Certificate of tax payable set aside for non-compliance with statutory requirements under Section 90(2) of Finance (No.2) Act, 1998.

14 Jul 2023

The petitioner, The Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the legality and validity of orders passed by Respondent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Declaration Under Section 72 of Customs Act, 1962. Declaration Filed Beyond Scope of Scheme as It Sought to Include Disputes Not Covered by Pending Appeal.

29 Sep 2010

The petitioners, Anup Engineering Limited and Shri V.R. Shah, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging an order/com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Service Tax Recovery Under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. Petitioner's Pre-Deposit of 7.5% of Disputed Tax Entitles It to Settlement Under KVSS, 1998 Despite Pending Adjudication.

22 Jun 2021

The petitioner, M. Ramzan & Co., a firm engaged in providing works contract services and holding registration under Service Tax Law, was issued a show...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Clarification Denying Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Benefit to Warehoused Raw Materials. Customs Authorities' Orders Declining KVSS Benefit for Imported Raw Materials Stored in Bonded Warehouse Upheld as Per Ministry Clarification.

15 Sep 2005

The petitioners, ex-partners of M/s. Zuari Stainless Steel Industries, a 100% export-oriented unit, imported raw materials (steel sheets in coils) whi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Endorsement on RT-12 Return Constitutes Notice of Demand Under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The Court examines the rejection of a declaration under the KVS Scheme on the ground of absence of a show cause notice, where the RT-12 return contained a specific demand endorsement.

29 Jun 2005

The petitioner, a manufacturer of processed fabrics, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of its declaration u...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Concerning Denial of Waiver Benefits under Karasamadhana Scheme, 2017. Petitioners challenged endorsements rejecting claims for waiver of penalty and interest under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

14 Nov 2017

...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)