Search Results for "Kamarunnisa"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Detention Order in Goonda Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority's Reliance on Irrelevant Bail Order Without Similar Facts Vitiated Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Karishma Kapoor, wife of the detenu Sai Sudhahar @ Sudhahar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proximate Link Between Offences and Public Order. Preventive detention set aside as criminal activities did not disturb public order, only law and order.

The petitioner, Sangita Nandu Toradmal, mother of the detenue Sanket @ Khoonkhar Dadya Nandu Toradmal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPD Act for Non-Application of Mind Regarding Likelihood of Bail. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Authority Failed to Assess Real Possibility of Bail in Pending Cases, Violating Kamarunnisa Principle.

The petitioner, Sagar @ Manish Shailesh Belamkar, challenged a detention order dated 30 April 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Support Apprehension of Bail. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application; Detaining Authority's Satisfaction of Imminent Release Held Unsubstantiated.

The petitioner, Sagar Sunil Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention dated 27 September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty Soon Before Death. Presumption under Section 113B of Evidence Act cannot be invoked without proof of demand of dowry and cruelty within seven years of marriage.

The case pertains to an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against the acquittal of four respondents (Shaikh Ajij Shaikh Musa, Kamarunnisa, Shahnaz, a...