Search Results for "IOD"

113 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 113 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Condition in IOD Requiring Registered Agreement with Tenant for Redevelopment. Condition No.10 in IOD directing that registered agreement with existing tenant not be submitted before CC is set aside as arbitrary and contrary to DCR.

The Petitioner, MIG (Bandra) Realtors and Builders Pvt. Ltd., a developer, acquired redevelopment rights over land admeasuring approximately 20149.40 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition Challenging City Civil Court Jurisdiction in Tenant Eviction Suit. Agreement for Sale and Power of Attorney Do Not Create Landlord-Tenant Relationship Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947, Section 28.

The present writ petition challenged an order dated 9.8.2005 passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay, on a preliminary issue of jurisdiction in L.C. Su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Lease by BEST Undertaking Without Following Principles of Natural Justice. Lease Termination Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice as No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given.

The petitioner, Fortpoint Automotive Private Limited, was allotted a portion of land at Mahim Bus Depot by the Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging TDR Loading and FSI Computation for Redevelopment Project. Court upholds MCGM's permission for TDR and fungible FSI, finding no illegality or public interest violation.

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the permission gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Municipal Commissioner's Order Imposing Conditions on Building Permission. Held that conditions imposed after amalgamation and building permission were invalid as they were not part of the original sanction.

The petitioner, Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited, was a lessee of two plots bearing plot Nos. 252 and 217 and 217A. On 15.9.1970, the petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Resident Welfare Association Against Developer for Non-Payment of Adequate Compensation Under DCR 33(7). MHADA Directed to Determine and Enforce Compensation for Temporary Alternate Accommodation as Per Notarized Agreements.

The petitioner, Kagalwala Building Resident Welfare Association, representing residents of a building being redeveloped by respondent No.4 (Aaraaish D...