Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Lease by BEST Undertaking Without Following Principles of Natural Justice. Lease Termination Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice as No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 18
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Fortpoint Automotive Private Limited, was allotted a portion of land at Mahim Bus Depot by the Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BEST) in 1992 on lease. The petitioner paid a security deposit of Rs.12,75,000/-. Subsequently, the lease was terminated by BEST without any notice or opportunity of hearing and without passing a reasoned order. The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the termination. The court held that BEST, being a public authority, is bound to follow principles of natural justice before terminating a lease. The impugned order was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remitted back to BEST to pass a fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Lease Termination by Public Authority - Requirement of Hearing and Reasoned Order - The petitioner's lease was terminated by BEST without any notice or opportunity of hearing and without a reasoned order - Held that such termination is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice - The impugned order was quashed and set aside (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of lease by a public authority without giving an opportunity of hearing and without passing a reasoned order is valid in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order of termination was quashed and set aside. The matter was remitted back to BEST to pass a fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Lease termination
  • Public authority
  • Opportunity of hearing
  • Reasoned order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (09) 32

WRIT PETITION NO.145 OF 2018

2018-09-19

R.D. DHANUKA, J.

Mr.Harish Pandya with Mr.H.K. Sudhakaran I/b KKS Legal for the Petitioner, Ms.Dhond for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2, Mr.Aseem Naphade with Ms.Kavita Anchan I/b M.V. Kini & Co. for the Respondent Nos.3 and 4

Fortpoint Automotive Private Limited

Mumbai Municipal Corporation, The Commissioner, Mumbai Municipal Corporation, The Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking, The Estate Manager & Competent Authority, The Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging termination of lease by a public authority without following principles of natural justice.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the termination order and restoration of the lease.

Filing Reason

The lease was terminated without any notice or opportunity of hearing and without a reasoned order.

Previous Decisions

The writ petition was earlier dismissed by the Registrar (Judicial-I) against respondent nos.1 and 2, but that order was set aside by consent.

Issues

Whether the termination of lease by BEST without giving an opportunity of hearing and without a reasoned order is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the termination was arbitrary and violative of natural justice. The respondents did not oppose the restoration of the petition and consented to the final hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

A public authority must follow principles of natural justice before terminating a lease, including giving an opportunity of hearing and passing a reasoned order.

Judgment Excerpts

By consent of the respondent nos.1 and 2, the order dated 20th July, 2017 passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial-I) dismissing the writ petition against the respondent nos.1 and 2 is set aside. The writ petition against the respondent nos.1 and 2 is restored to file.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2018. It was dismissed against respondent nos.1 and 2 by the Registrar on 20th July 2017. That order was set aside by consent on 19th September 2018, and the petition was heard finally.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Forgery Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Dishonest Intent. SSC Certificate Forgery Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove Accused Used Certificate for Regularization or That He Was Not Entitled to Regulariza...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Lease by BEST Undertaking Without Following Principles of Natural Justice. Lease Termination Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice as No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given.