Search Results for "Hudson's Formula"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Hudson's Formula"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Recovery Proceeding Under MRTU & PULP Act — Recovery Application Filed Beyond Limitation Period Held Not Maintainable. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that the application under Section 50 of the MRTU & PULP Act was barred by limitation as it was not filed within the prescribed period.

9 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Vidyu Metallics Employees Union, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1923, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 a...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Arbitral Award Setting Aside Penalties, Termination, and Blacklisting in Sewerage Treatment Plant Contract Dispute

6 Feb 2026

The High Court of Bombay heard cross-petitions challenging an arbitral award dated 18 June 2020 in a dispute between Solapur Municipal Corporation and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 12% per annum. Arbitrator's Award of Interest at 18% Held to be Excessive and Not in Accordance with Contractual Stipulation of 12% under Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Feb 2019

The case involves an arbitration petition filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Petitioner) challenging an arbitral award passed by a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Upholds Award on Compensation for Delay but Sets Aside Award of Interest on Mobilisation Advance. Arbitrator's findings on delay and compensation held plausible, but interest on mobilisation advance contrary to contract terms under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Feb 2019

The case arises from a construction contract between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Petitioner) and S.N. Thakkar Construction Company Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Price Escalation Dispute Under FIDIC Contracts — Formula Interpretation Not Permissible When Language Is Clear. Court holds that a price escalation formula in a contract, being a mathematical expression, cannot be interpreted or varied by an arbitrator if its terms are unambiguous.

31 Mar 2017

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising from contracts between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and two contractors, M/s. A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Contractor's Petition and Dismisses State's Petitions in BOT Contract Dispute — Extension of Concession Period and Damages for Suspension of Toll Collection Upheld. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of the BOT contract regarding extension of concession period and damages, finding no error apparent on the face of the award under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.

12 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns three arbitration petitions arising from two arbitral awards under the Arbitration Act, 1940, relating to a Build, Operate and T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. The court restored the arbitral award holding that the Single Judge exceeded jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by reappreciating evidence.

24 Jun 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award dated 16 January 2009 under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Overhead Losses and Loss of Profit Claims Based on Hudson's Formula Without Proof of Actual Loss. The court held that an arbitral award granting overhead losses and loss of profit without evidence of actual loss is patently illegal and contrary to public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Jan 2013

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a judgment of a Learned Single Judge dated 11 Nove...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Maharashtra Tax on Lotteries, Betting and Gambling Act, 2006 — Levy on Entry Fee for Games of Skill and Chance Upheld. The Court held that the tax on entry fee for games like poker, rummy, and bridge is a valid compensatory tax under Entry 62 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India.

10 Apr 2012

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Tax on Lotteries, Betting and Gambling Act,...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Ground for Interference Made Out. Arbitrator's findings on facts and law are final unless perverse or contrary to public policy; reappreciation of evidence not permissible under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 Feb 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Shah Jagshi Jethabhai, a construction firm, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 January 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator under ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)