High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Arbitral Award Setting Aside Penalties, Termination, and Blacklisting in Sewerage Treatment Plant Contract Dispute

Sub Category: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 15
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Bombay heard cross-petitions challenging an arbitral award dated 18 June 2020 in a dispute between Solapur Municipal Corporation and a joint venture contractor (S.M.C.-G.E.C.P. Ltd). The arbitrator had set aside penalties imposed on the contractor, terminated the contract, and blacklisted the contractor, awarding Rs. 32,15,94,780/- with interest. The Municipal Corporation challenged the entire award, while the contractor challenged limited aspects but later withdrew its petition. The Court examined whether the award suffered from patent illegality or was contrary to public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. After reviewing the arbitrator's findings on evidence, contractual terms, and procedural fairness, the Court dismissed the Municipal Corporation's petition, upholding the award. The contractor's cross-petition was not pressed, leaving only the Municipal Corporation's challenge for decision.

Headnote

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 444 of 2024 filed by Solapur Municipal Corporation challenging an arbitral award dated 18 June 2020 -- The award had set aside four penalty orders, termination of contract dated 9 December 2013, and blacklisting order dated 11 April 2014 -- The arbitrator awarded Rs. 32,15,94,780/- with interest to the contractor -- The Court held that the arbitrator's findings were based on evidence and contractual interpretation -- The Court found no patent illegality or violation of public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 -- The contractor's cross-petition (CARBP/252/2024) was not pressed -- The Municipal Corporation's challenge to the award was rejected

Issue of Consideration: The Issue of Consideration was whether the arbitral award dated 18 June 2020, which set aside penalties, termination of contract, and blacklisting orders while awarding compensation to the contractor, suffered from any patent illegality or was contrary to public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 444 of 2024 filed by Solapur Municipal Corporation, upholding the arbitral award dated 18 June 2020. The contractor's cross-petition (CARBP/252/2024) was not pressed.

2026 LawText (BOM) (02) 27

Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 444 of 2024 with Interim Application (L) No. 2001 of 2022 and Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 252 of 2024

2026-02-06

Sandeep V. Marne, J.

2026:BHC-OS:3578

Mr. M.P. Rao, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishwanath Patil, Ms. Nidhi Chauhan, Mr. Akshay Naidu for Petitioner in CARBP/444/2024 & Respondent in CARBP/252/2024, Mr. Shardul Singh with Ms. Prerna Gandhi, Mr. Anisa Shahapurkar, Mr. Ninad Thikekar for Respondent in CARBP/444/2024 & Petitioner in CARBP/252/2024

The Commissioner, Solapur Municipal Corporation and Ors

M/s. S.M.C.-G.E.C.P. Ltd (J.V.)

Nature of Litigation: Commercial arbitration petitions challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Remedy Sought

Solapur Municipal Corporation sought setting aside of the arbitral award dated 18 June 2020, while the contractor initially sought modification of certain aspects but later withdrew its challenge

Filing Reason

Disputes arose from termination of a contract for sewerage treatment plant works, imposition of penalties, and blacklisting of the contractor

Previous Decisions

Arbitral award dated 18 June 2020 set aside penalties, termination order, and blacklisting order, awarding Rs. 32,15,94,780/- with interest to the contractor

Issues

Whether the arbitral award suffered from patent illegality or was contrary to public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Whether the arbitrator's findings on penalties, termination, and blacklisting were based on evidence and contractual interpretation

Submissions/Arguments

Municipal Corporation argued the award was illegal and against public policy Contractor defended the award as based on evidence and proper contractual interpretation

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that judicial review of arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is limited to patent illegality and public policy violations. The arbitrator's findings on evidence, contractual terms, and procedural fairness did not suffer from such defects, warranting dismissal of the challenge.

Judgment Excerpts

These are cross Petitions filed by the parties challenging the Award of the learned sole Arbitrator dated 18 June 2020 By the impugned Award, the learned sole Arbitrator has awarded a sum of Rs.32,15,94,780/- alongwith interest in favour of the Contractor by setting aside penalties as well as order of termination of contract dated 9 December 2013 and order of blacklisting dated 11 April 2014 The Contractor has decided not to press challenge to the impugned arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 252 of 2024 Thus, this Court is tasked upon to decide only the challenge raised by Solapur Municipal Corporation to the impugned Arbitral Award

Procedural History

Contract awarded on 2 January 2012 for sewerage treatment plant works -- Penalties imposed starting 20 September 2012 -- Contract terminated on 9 December 2013 -- Contractor blacklisted on 11 April 2014 -- Writ Petition No. 11657 of 2013 filed and disposed of on 2 April 2014, constituting arbitral tribunal -- Statement of Claim filed on 13 December 2014 -- Arbitral award dated 18 June 2020 -- Cross-petitions filed in 2024 challenging the award

Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Arbitral Award Se...
Related Judgement
High Court "Bombay High Court Judgment on Maintainability of Appeals in Execution Proceedin...