Search Results for "Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules"

14 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Stone Crusher's Petition Against Closure of Mining Lease Account. Court holds that partnership firm is entitled to continue quarry lease operations under Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017 despite change in constitution of firm.

The petitioner, Shiv Stone Crusher, a partnership firm, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State to Enhance Royalty/Dead Rent in Mining Leases Despite Absence of Express Clause. Statutory Provisions Under Section 15(3) of MMDR Act and Rules 10 and 21 of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964 Impliedly Authorize Enhancement During Subsistence of Lease.

The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Haryana against judgments of the Punjab and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Instructions Prohibiting Transportation of Ready Mix Plaster from Gujarat to Maharashtra. Instructions Based on Gujarat Notification for Sand Held Inapplicable to Ready Mix Plaster, Violating Article 301 of Constitution.

The petitioners, Dipak Logistics and Forwarders and Shiv Enterprise, challenged instructions issued by the Collector, Palghar (Respondent No.2) prohib...