Search Results for "Grampanchyat member"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Building Tax Assessment Orders Against Company in Panchayat Tax Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Orders Passed Without Hearing Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Weikfield Agro Products Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders dated 21.12....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Grampanchyat Member Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Court holds that encroachment by father-in-law or husband does not disqualify the elected member unless she herself is the encroacher.

The petitioner, Gorakh Baban Zende, a voter from Chikhali village, filed a dispute before the Collector seeking disqualification of respondent No.1, V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction for Murder in Grampanchayat Election Rivalry Case. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for fatal knife attack on deceased due to political grudge.

The appellant, Tulshiram S/o Balaji Pupalwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge at Biloli for the murder of Shankar Venkat Papulwad under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Tulshiram Balaji Pupalwad, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Shankar Venkat Papulwad. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Pre-Deposit Under Section 35(3-B) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act Held Mandatory for Entertaining Appeal Against No-Confidence Motion.

The petitioner, Gulab Pandu Chavan, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Chidgiri, Tq. Bhokar, Dist. Nanded. A no-confidence motion was initiated against...