Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Disqualify Panchayat Member for Having More Than Two Children Under Section 14(b) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. The Court held that the disqualification provision applies to any person having more than two children, regardless of whether the children are from the same spouse or different relationships, and that the Collector's order rejecting the disqualification application was perverse and unsustainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 134
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, Shri Tanaji Jagannath Palave, an elected Member of Panchayat Samiti from Ward No.5 of Village Panchayat Mandave, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 18/02/2021 passed by the Collector, Solapur, rejecting his Dispute Application No. 01/2021. The Petitioner sought disqualification of Respondent No.5, Nagarabai Jaywant Palave, who was elected as a Member from Ward No.4 in the same election held on 15.01.2021. The Petitioner alleged that Respondent No.5 had three children, thereby being disqualified under Section 14(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, which disqualifies a person having more than two children from being a Panchayat member. The Collector rejected the application on the ground that the children were from two different husbands and not from the same spouse, and thus the disqualification did not apply. The High Court examined the plain language of Section 14(b), which states that a person having more than two children is disqualified, without any exception for children from different relationships. The Court found the Collector's interpretation to be perverse and contrary to the legislative intent. The Court allowed the petition, quashed the Collector's order, and directed the Collector to disqualify Respondent No.5 from the post of Member of the Village Panchayat forthwith.

Headnote

A) Panchayat Law - Disqualification of Member - More Than Two Children - Section 14(b) Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - The issue was whether a person having three children from two different relationships is disqualified from being a Panchayat member. The Court held that the disqualification under Section 14(b) applies to any person who has more than two children, irrespective of whether the children are from the same spouse or different relationships. The Collector's order rejecting the disqualification application was perverse and set aside. (Paras 1-10)

B) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Perverse Order - The Court exercised its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash the Collector's order dated 18/02/2021, which was found to be perverse and based on a misinterpretation of the law. The Court directed the Collector to disqualify Respondent No.5 from the post of Member of the Village Panchayat. (Paras 11-14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Respondent No.5, who has three children, is disqualified from being a member of the Village Panchayat under Section 14(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and whether the Collector's order rejecting the disqualification application is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 18/02/2021 passed by the Collector, Solapur, and directed the Collector to disqualify Respondent No.5 from the post of Member of the Village Panchayat, Mandave, forthwith.

Law Points

  • Disqualification of Panchayat member
  • more than two children
  • Section 14(b) Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act
  • 1959
  • interpretation of 'children'
  • perverse order
  • writ jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (03) 39

WRIT PETITION NO. 4784 OF 2021

2022-03-23

S. J. KATHAWALLA, MILIND N. JADHAV

Mr. Sarang S. Aradhye for Petitioner, Mr. A.A. Kumbhkoni, Advocate General a/w Mr. P.P. Kakade, GP and Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for State, Mr. Rupesh K. Bobade for Respondent No.5, Mr. Milind Shambharkar, Collector Solapur present by Video Conferencing

Shri. Tanaji Jagannath Palave

The State of Maharashtra, The Collector Solapur, The Tahsildar Malshiras, The State Election Commission, Nagarabai Jaywant Palave, Nagarabai Tanaji Palve

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Collector rejecting a disqualification application under Section 14(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of Collector's order dated 18/02/2021 and disqualification of Respondent No.5 from the post of Member of Village Panchayat.

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged that Respondent No.5 has three children and is disqualified under Section 14(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

Previous Decisions

Collector, Solapur rejected the Dispute Application No. 01/2021 filed by the Petitioner on 18/02/2021.

Issues

Whether Respondent No.5 is disqualified under Section 14(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 for having more than two children. Whether the Collector's order rejecting the disqualification application is perverse and liable to be set aside.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that Respondent No.5 has three children and is thus disqualified under Section 14(b) of the Act. Respondent No.5 contended that the children are from two different husbands and not from the same spouse, and therefore the disqualification does not apply.

Ratio Decidendi

The disqualification under Section 14(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 applies to any person having more than two children, irrespective of whether the children are from the same spouse or different relationships. The Collector's interpretation that the disqualification only applies if the children are from the same spouse is perverse and contrary to the plain language and legislative intent of the provision.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present petition, the Petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs: ... The Petitioner is the elected Member of Panchayat Samiti from Ward No.5 of Village Panchayat - Mandave, the election to which was held on 15.01.2021. It is the Petitioner's case that Respondent No.5 has three children and is thus disqualified under Section 14(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

Procedural History

The Petitioner filed Dispute Application No. 01/2021 before the Collector, Solapur under Section 14(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, seeking disqualification of Respondent No.5. The Collector rejected the application on 18/02/2021. The Petitioner received the order on 23/02/2021 and filed the present writ petition before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959: Section 14(b)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Refund Under Section 244A(1)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Refund Arising from Appellate Order Not Subject to 10% Threshold. The court held that the 10% threshold under Section 244A(1)(b) applies only to refunds ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Allows Writ Petition for Ex-Gratia Compensation to Legal Heirs of COVID-19 Deceased Government Employee. The court held that the cutoff date in Government Resolution dated 25.04.2022 applies to the date of contracting COVID-19, not the dat...