High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction for Murder in Grampanchayat Election Rivalry Case. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for fatal knife attack on deceased due to political grudge.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Tulshiram S/o Balaji Pupalwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge at Biloli for the murder of Shankar Venkat Papulwad under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The incident occurred on 15.12.2010 at about 1.00 p.m. near the deceased's house in Patoda village. The deceased, along with others, was weighing soyabean when the appellant, armed with a big knife, attacked him. The appellant gave a knife blow to the deceased's abdomen and a second blow to his neck, stating that the deceased had ruined his life by supporting the opposite party in Grampanchayat elections, causing his defeat. The deceased was taken to Barbada hospital and later referred to Nanded, where he succumbed to injuries. The prosecution examined witnesses including the first informant (son of deceased), an eyewitness, and the Executive Magistrate who recorded the dying declaration. The trial court convicted the appellant. In appeal, the High Court examined the evidence, particularly the dying declaration, which was recorded by the Executive Magistrate after certification by a doctor that the deceased was conscious. The court found the dying declaration to be voluntary, consistent, and corroborated by medical evidence. The motive of political rivalry was established through evidence of election contests. The court upheld the conviction, finding no reason to interfere with the trial court's judgment.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on dying declaration and motive - The appellant was convicted for murdering the deceased by giving knife blows on abdomen and neck due to political rivalry in Grampanchayat elections - The court upheld the conviction relying on the dying declaration of the deceased recorded by the Executive Magistrate and the medical evidence corroborating the injuries - Held that the dying declaration was voluntary, consistent, and trustworthy, and the motive was established through election rivalry (Paras 1-34).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder is sustainable based on the evidence of motive, dying declaration, and medical evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction of appellant under Section 302 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Motive
  • Dying Declaration
  • Medical Evidence
  • Credibility of Witnesses
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (07) 7

Criminal Appeal No. 385 of 2014

2021-07-07

V. K. Jadhav, Shrikant D. Kulkarni

Mr. S. U. Choudhari for Appellant, Mr. S.P. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent/State

Tulshiram S/o Balaji Pupalwad

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of Shankar Venkat Papulwad by giving knife blows due to political rivalry

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC on 24.05.2013

Issues

Whether the dying declaration is reliable and sufficient to sustain conviction Whether the motive of political rivalry is established Whether the medical evidence corroborates the prosecution case

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the dying declaration was not reliable and there were contradictions in prosecution evidence State argued that the dying declaration was voluntary and corroborated by medical evidence, and motive was established

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration recorded by an Executive Magistrate after certification of consciousness by a doctor is admissible and reliable. Motive of political rivalry, though not essential, strengthens the prosecution case. Medical evidence corroborating the injuries supports the dying declaration.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction passed in Sessions Case No.20 of 2011 by the Additional Sessions Judge at Biloli dated 24.05.2013 whereby the appellant / original accused no.1 has been convicted of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge at Biloli on 24.05.2013 in Sessions Case No.20 of 2011 for offence under Section 302 IPC. He appealed to the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad. The appeal was heard and judgment pronounced on 07.07.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Appeal in Employee Compensation Case - Assault by Employer Not Compensable Under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 as It Does Not Constitute an 'Accident'
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction for Murder in Grampanchayat Election Rivalry Case. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for fatal knife attack on deceased due to political grudge.