Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Grampanchyat Member Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Court holds that encroachment by father-in-law or husband does not disqualify the elected member unless she herself is the encroacher.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 15
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Gorakh Baban Zende, a voter from Chikhali village, filed a dispute before the Collector seeking disqualification of respondent No.1, Vaishali Ramdas Zende, an elected member of the Grampanchyat, under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The ground was that her father-in-law had encroached upon Grampanchyat land since 1991, and after his death in 1997, her husband continued the encroachment. The Collector, by order dated 21.06.2022, held respondent No.1 disqualified. However, the Additional Commissioner, Nashik, in Grampanchyat Appeal No.91 of 2022, set aside the Collector's order, leading the petitioner to file the present writ petition. The High Court examined the language of Section 14(1)(j-3), which disqualifies a person who has encroached upon any property of the Grampanchyat. The court noted that the provision does not extend to acts of relatives. The court held that the disqualification is personal to the member and cannot be imposed vicariously for encroachment by her father-in-law or husband. The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the Additional Commissioner's order, and restored the Collector's order disqualifying respondent No.1.

Headnote

A) Gram Panchayat - Disqualification of Member - Section 14(1)(j-3) Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Encroachment by Relative - The petitioner sought disqualification of respondent No.1 on ground that her father-in-law and husband had encroached upon Grampanchyat land. The Collector disqualified her, but the Additional Commissioner set aside the order. The High Court held that the disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-3) applies only if the member herself has encroached upon the land. There is no provision for vicarious liability for acts of relatives. The court allowed the writ petition and restored the Collector's order. (Paras 1-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a member of Grampanchyat can be disqualified under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 on the ground that her father-in-law or husband had encroached upon Grampanchyat land.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The order dated 21.06.2022 passed by the Collector is restored. The order passed by the Additional Commissioner is quashed and set aside.

Law Points

  • Disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act
  • 1958 requires personal encroachment by the member
  • vicarious liability not applicable
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (07) 18

Writ Petition No.387 of 2023

2023-07-05

Kishore C. Sant

Mr.Shelke Shivaji T. for Petitioner, Mr. A.A. Khande h/f Mr.Dond Manoj A. for Respondent No.1, Mr. Lokhande Kishor N. for Respondent No.2, Mr.K.B.Jadhavar AGP for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4/State

Gorakh Baban Zende

Vaishali Ramdas Zende, The Gramsevak, Gram Panchyat Chikhali, The Collector, Ahmednagar, The Additional Commissioner, Nashik

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of Additional Commissioner setting aside the Collector's order disqualifying a Grampanchyat member.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of Additional Commissioner's order and restoration of Collector's order disqualifying respondent No.1.

Filing Reason

Petitioner contended that respondent No.1's father-in-law and husband had encroached upon Grampanchyat land, making her disqualified under Section 14(1)(j-3).

Previous Decisions

Collector disqualified respondent No.1 on 21.06.2022; Additional Commissioner set aside that order in Grampanchyat Appeal No.91 of 2022.

Issues

Whether a member of Grampanchyat can be disqualified under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 for encroachment by her father-in-law or husband.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that respondent No.1's father-in-law and husband encroached upon Grampanchyat land, thus she is disqualified. Respondent No.1 argued that the disqualification is personal and cannot be based on acts of relatives.

Ratio Decidendi

The disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 is personal to the member and cannot be imposed for encroachment by her father-in-law or husband. There is no vicarious liability under the provision.

Judgment Excerpts

The disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-3) is personal to the member and cannot be imposed for encroachment by her father-in-law or husband.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed dispute before Collector seeking disqualification of respondent No.1. Collector disqualified her on 21.06.2022. Respondent No.1 appealed to Additional Commissioner who set aside the order. Petitioner then filed writ petition in High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958: Section 14(1)(j-3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Grampanchyat Member Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Court holds that encroachment by father-in-law or husband does not disqualify the elected...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Licensing Order Breach Case Due to Repeal of Enabling Order. Conviction under Maharashtra Scheduled Oil Seeds and Oils (Dealers and Millers) Licensing Order, 1973 set aside as the Order was repealed in 1977, ren...