Search Results for "Fortuitous Promotions"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Fortuitous Promotions"

37 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Senior Stenographer Seeking Consideration for Promotion to Assistant Personnel Officer — Holds That Ad Hoc Appointment in Clear Vacancy Does Not Disqualify Employee from Being Considered for Promotion. The court interpreted eligibility criteria liberally to include ad hoc promotions made in non-fortuitous vacancies under Railway Board circular.

22 Feb 2005

The petitioner, G. Subbiah, was appointed as a Junior Stenographer with the Western Railway on 19th October 1981. He was promoted to the post of Senio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Whether Retrospective Absorption Order Requires Review of Earlier Promotional Exercises for Superintendents (Legal/Drafting). Legal Principle Examined: Whether Regular Service for Promotion Can Be Counted Retrospectively When Government Recognises Prior Cadre Status.

30 Jul 2026

The writ petition was filed by two Legal Assistants working in the Law Department of the Government of Goa, who sought a review of the departmental pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows State's Writ Against Tribunal Order on Seniority Rules for Engineers. Direction for Non-Fortuitous Promotion of Backward Class Officers from Other Cadres Held Inconsistent with Definition of Fortuitous Appointment Under Maharashtra Service of Engineers (Class I and Class II) Rules, 1983.

27 Jan 2005

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 27t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Union of India and Commissioner of Central Excise Challenging CAT Order Quashing Reversion of Adhoc Promotee. Reversion of an employee promoted on adhoc basis upon revocation of suspension is illegal; employee entitled to reinstatement in promotional post.

13 Apr 2006

The Union of India and the Commissioner of Central Excise filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mum...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

5 Mar 2019

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion and Seniority in MIDC — Petitioner Granted Deemed Date of Promotion with Consequential Benefits. Court Holds That Sealed Cover Procedure Cannot Be Applied When No Punishment Is Imposed and That Promotion Must Be Granted from the Date of Eligibility.

8 May 2015

The petitioner, Prabhakar Jagguji Rangari, joined the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) in 1978 as an Overseer and was promoted th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Service Law Case — Notional Financial Benefits Upheld Despite No Actual Promotion. Rule 54(1)(a) of West Bengal Service Rules Precludes Retrospective Promotion but Notional Benefits Granted Due to Administrative Delay.

6 Dec 2024

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court at Calcutta which upheld an order of the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal directing tha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion in State Excise Department — Seniority and Eligibility Determined by Recruitment Rules and Select List. The court upheld the Tribunal's dismissal of the challenge to promotion of respondents to Joint Commissioner post, finding petitioner not eligible as per select list.

25 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Pratapsinh Damodar Golekar, a Deputy Commissioner of State Excise, filed Original Application No.220 of 1995 before the Maharashtra Ad...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bihar State Electricity Board's Appeal Against Retrospective Promotion Order — Kal Awadhi is Eligibility Criterion, Not Entitlement to Immediate Promotion. The Court held that promotion is effective from the date of grant, not from the date of vacancy, and that completion of qualifying service does not create a right to automatic promotion.

26 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Bihar State Electricity Board against the judgment of the Patna High Court Division Bench which had ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Promotee Appeal in Seniority Dispute with Direct Recruits in Income Tax Department — Direct Recruits Not Entitled to Seniority from Vacancy Year When Recruitment Process Not Initiated in That Year.

1 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by promotees (appellants) against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had quashed the seniority li...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)