Search Results for "Displaced Persons Claims"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Displaced Persons Claims"

115 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Land Allotment Under Displaced Persons Act Due to Laches. Court Holds That Displaced Persons Act, 1954 Does Not Envisage Issuance of Orders by Custodian for Execution of Compensation Claims.

9 May 2025

The petitioner, Chandru Mirchandani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a direc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Shamlat Deh Land Dispute — Amendment Protection Not Available Without Proof of Allotment to Displaced Person. Land recorded as Shamlat deh in revenue records cannot be excluded from definition under Section 2(g) of Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 unless allotment on quasi-permanent basis to displaced person or transfer by sale before 09.07.1985 is established.

10 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of Special Leave Petitions challenging orders of eviction from lands claimed to be Shamlat deh under the Punjab Vi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Shortfall Land Due to Delay and Laches. Claim for balance land under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999 rejected as application made 37 years after acquisition award and 20 years after enactment without explanation.

26 Jul 2023

The petitioner, legal heir of Tatoba Rama Chavan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the resp...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Approves Compensation Scheme for Tribal Landowners in Coal Mining Acquisition - Mahanadi Coalfields Directed to Pay Compensation for Lands Acquired in 1987-1989. Market value determined as of 2010 survey date due to 28-year delay in compensation.

3 Nov 2022

The case concerns the long-pending compensation claims of landowners, predominantly tribal communities, whose lands were acquired for coal mining by M...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Land Oustee Rehabilitation Case — Policy for Preferential Employment Does Not Exempt Selection Process. The Court held that the Railway Board's policy for offering employment to displaced persons does not exempt them from undergoing the selection process; they must fulfill qualifications and be found suitable by recruitment committees.

1 Mar 2019

The dispute pertains to the rehabilitation of land oustees whose lands were acquired between 1984-85 and 1992-93 for the Sambalpur-Talcher Rail Link P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Land Oustee Rehabilitation Case — Policy for Preferential Employment Does Not Exempt Selection Process. The Court held that the Railway Board's policy for preferential treatment to land oustees does not exempt them from undergoing the selection process; they must fulfill qualifications and be found suitable by recruitment committees.

1 Mar 2019

The dispute pertains to the rehabilitation of land oustees whose lands were acquired between 1984-85 and 1992-93 for the Sambalpur-Talcher Rail Link P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Displaced Persons Land Allotment Case — CCLA Had Authority to Allot Land as Delegatee of Central Government Under Displaced Persons (Compensation & Rehabilitation) Act, 1954. The Court upheld the allotment of 19.26 standard acres to the appellant as balance of verified claim, rejecting the State's challenge on grounds of authority, vesting, and delay.

1 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Ramesh Parsram Malani and others against the State of Telangana and others, setting aside the High Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Deficit Court Fee Demand in Railway Claims Tribunal Appeal. Fixed Court Fee of Rs.25 Held Applicable Under Article 3 of Schedule II of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 for Appeals Under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

2 Aug 2017

The applicants, dependants of deceased Rajanna Linganna Akitwar who died in an untoward incident of falling from a train on 23.04.2012, filed a claim ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Under Section 33 of Displaced Persons Compensation and Rehabilitation Act, 1954 — Evacuee Property Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Ownership and Possession. The court held that the burden of proof lies on the claimant to establish ownership and possession of property notified as evacuee property under Section 7 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1947.

11 May 2012

The petitioners, Shaikh Mohammad Murghay and Smt. Sheela Ravindra Lakhanpal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against Revision of Verified Claim under Displaced Persons (Claims) Supplementary Act, 1954. Dispute Concerns Scope of Chief Settlement Commissioner's Revisional Jurisdiction Over Valuation of Claim.

10 Oct 1969

The appellant, Tribhuban Parkash Nayyar, a displaced person from West Pakistan, submitted a claim under the Displaced Persons (Claims) Act, 1950, for ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)