Search Results for "Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum"

138 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 138 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CGRF Clarification Order for Lack of Jurisdiction — Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Cannot Review or Clarify Its Own Orders Under Electricity Act, 2003. CGRF's Order Directing MSEDCL to Refund Excess FAC Installments Set Aside as Without Authority of Law.

20 Jan 2023

The Bombay High Court considered a writ petition filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging an order dated ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes CGRF Order Directing MSEDCL to Provide Supply from Gaothan Feeder — Forum Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that the CGRF cannot direct a distribution licensee to provide supply from a specific feeder as such operational decisions are within the licensee's domain.

7 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), challenged an order dated 6/12/2010 passed by the Consumer Grievance...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Petition by Electricity Department Officials Challenging Consumer Forum Orders — Forum Lacked Jurisdiction as Respondent Was Not a Registered Consumer Under Electricity Act, 2003. Assessment for Unauthorised Use of Electricity Could Not Be Challenged by a Non-Consumer Before the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum.

27 Jul 2023

The petitioners, officials of the Electricity Department, Government of Goa, filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 12/06/2017 and 18/09/2017 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Challenging Consumer Forum Order Setting Aside Supplementary Bills. Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Has Jurisdiction Under Section 42(5) of Electricity Act, 2003 to Adjudicate Disputes Regarding Defective Metering and Supplementary Bills.

18 Dec 2018

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25.03.2017 passed by the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

16 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL Petition Challenging CGRF Order Setting Aside Interest and Delayed Payment Charges. Court holds that CGRF exceeded its jurisdiction by setting aside demand without considering that respondent had not paid entire bill amount and that interest and DPC are governed by terms of supply and regulations.

12 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), challenged an order of the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petition Against CGRF Order in Electricity Connection Cost Refund Dispute. Distribution Licensee Not Obligated to Refund Infrastructure Costs for Dedicated Distribution Transformer Under Electricity Act, 2003.

22 Jan 2021

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), a Distribution Licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003, filed thre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Order Against Non-Party — Order Directing Compensation to Complainants Set Aside as Petitioner Not Impleaded as Opposite Party. The Court Held That No Order Can Be Passed Against a Person Without Giving Them an Opportunity of Being Heard, and the Consumer Forum Exceeded Its Jurisdiction.

20 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Govind Dewaji Chavan, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 27-12-2016 passed by the District Consumer Disput...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Proceedings as Not Maintainable. Section 28 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Bars Suits Against Forum Members for Acts Done in Good Faith.

23 Jun 2011

The petitioner, Smt. Sheela Sanjay Sharma, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay Hi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Consumer Forum Notice Against Restaurant Company for Lack of Consumer Relationship. Petitioner Company not a 'Consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as the respondent was not a consumer of its services.

27 Dec 2013

The petitioner, M/s Vasudeva Adiga's Fast Food Pvt Ltd, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, running vegetarian restaurants in Bangal...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)