Search Results for "Composite vehicle"

146 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 146 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals By Appellants. Against State Of Gujarat Ors. -- Holds Construction Equipment Not Motor Vehicles Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Exempts From Registration And Tax Under Gujarat Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958

The Supreme Court examined whether various construction equipment used by cement manufacturers within their factory premises constitute 'motor vehicle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Manufacturer's Appeal in Airbag Non-Deployment Case. Non-Disclosure of Airbag Deployment Threshold Constitutes Unfair Trade Practice Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a consumer complaint filed by Shailendra Bhatnagar against Hyundai Motor India Limited regarding non-deployment of airbags in hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Upholds Consumer Fora Orders for Compensation. Ownership of Vehicle Not Transferred Despite Sale Agreement; Insurer Liable to Pay Claim Amount with Interest.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Surendra Kumar Bhilawe against The New India Assurance Company Limited, setting aside the National Commi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Finding on Negligence. Tribunal's Dismissal Set Aside as Composite Negligence Established and Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the appellants (husband, son, and mother-in-law of the deceased) before the Motor Accide...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals by BMTC and Insurance Company in Motor Accident Claim — No Negligence by BMTC Driver Established. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding that the tipper lorry driver was solely negligent, and the compensation of Rs.25,000/- with interest was just and proper.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 19.08.2012 involving a BMTC bus (KA-01-F-4447) and a tipper lorry (AP-07-U-8783). The claimant,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Evidence Identifying Driver. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act Quashed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Applicant Was Driving the Offending Tempo.

The applicant, Ramnath Yashwant Gholap, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Ashti, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order in Entry Tax Case — Chassis Entry Tax Levy Set Aside as Chassis Not 'Goods' Under Entry Tax Act After Integration into Bus Body.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax and the Entry Tax Officer, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Income Proof. Claimant's 100% Permanent Disability Acknowledged but Multiplier and Income Assessment Modified Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The National Insurance Company Ltd. appealed against the judgment and order dated 7.6.2004 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Pune, in Claim Peti...