Search Results for "Central Government exclusive jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Central Government exclusive jurisdiction"

996 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 996 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State of Uttar Pradesh in Citizenship Dispute, Holding Section 9 of Indian Citizenship Act Applies Retrospectively and Central Government Has Exclusive Jurisdiction. The Court ruled that the determination of whether a person voluntarily acquired foreign citizenship between 1950 and 1955 is exclusively for the Central Government under Section 9(2) and Rule 30, not for civil courts.

13 Mar 1969

The litigation arose from a suit filed by respondent No. 1, Shah Mohammad, who was born in undivided India on July 3, 1934. He went to Pakistan in Oct...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows FCI Appeal in Property Tax Exemption Case — Holds That Occupier of Central Government Property Is Not Liable Under Article 285(1) When Ownership Vests in Union. Bombay High Court Erred in Relying on Section 146 of MMC Act Without Considering Ownership Status.

19 Mar 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 05.05.2016 and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State Government's Petition to Quash Inclusion Notification for Medical College; Dismisses Institution's Petition for Disaffiliation. Inclusion of Raja Rajeshwari Medical College as Constituent Institution of Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute Under UGC Regulations Set Aside for Non-Consideration of State's Objection.

3 Nov 2020

The case comprised two writ petitions heard together by the Karnataka High Court concerning the inclusion of Raja Rajeshwari Medical College, Bangalor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Suit Under Article 131 for Lack of Cause of Action and Suppression of Material Facts. The suit challenging the validity of notifications under the DSPE Act was held not maintainable as the dispute was not between the State and the Union but between the State and its own officers.

10 Jul 2024

The State of West Bengal filed a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against the Union of India, challenging the validity of notificat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusive Power of Central Government to Appoint Arbitrator Under National Highways Act, 1956 — Section 11 of Arbitration Act, 1996 Not Maintainable. The Court held that the special enactment's inbuilt mechanism for arbitrator appointment prevails over the general arbitration law, and the High Court erred in appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6).

27 Aug 2019

The case involves a dispute between the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and Sayedabad Tea Company Ltd. regarding the acquisition of land f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Whether State Rent Control Act Is Ultra Vires in Cantonment Areas Due to Union's Exclusive Competence under Entry 3 of List I. The Case Involves Interpretation of 'Regulation of House Accommodation' in the Context of Legislative Powers over Cantonments.

29 Apr 1969

The case arose from a suit for eviction filed by Rama Sundari Devi, the owner of premises situated within the cantonment area of Barrackpore, against ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation to CBI — Considers Whether Article 131 Bars High Court's Jurisdiction and Scope of Section 35A, Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Petitioner Bank Alleges Multi-Crore Siphoning of Funds, Invoking RBI Master Circular for CBI Investigation.

13 Nov 2024

The Union Bank of India, a Central government undertaking, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Jurisdiction Dispute — Private Agreement Cannot Oust Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226. The Court held that Clause 21 of the All India Chess Federation's Constitution, conferring exclusive jurisdiction on Chennai courts, cannot bar the Bombay High Court from entertaining a writ petition under Article 226.

29 Jul 2019

The present appeal arose from a dispute between the Maharashtra Chess Association (Appellant) and the All India Chess Federation (second Respondent), ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutionality of National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, in Malegaon Blast Case. Petitioners Challenged Legislative Competence and Transfer of Investigation Without State Consent, Arguing Encroachment on State Police Powers.

11 Oct 2013

The matter arose from two criminal writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of the National Investigation...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)