Search Results for "Caltex Act 1977"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses HPCL's Revision Against Eviction Decree in Lease Renewal Dispute. HPCL's Claim of Statutory Right to Renew Lease Under Section 7(3) of Caltex Act Rejected as Lease Was Not Renewed Before Expiry of Original Term.

The case involves a dispute between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), the revision applicant, and the legal heirs of Mansukhlal Doshi, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree and Mesne Profit Order in Lease Dispute. Lease Deed Term Expired After Renewal Periods; Termination Notice Valid Under Section 41 of Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

The case involves a lease dispute between landlords (respondents) and a tenant (applicant, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited). The landlords exe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Possession Suit — Lease Deed Not Proved, No Tenancy Rights. Gift Deed Valid, Landlord's Title Not Challenged, Eviction Upheld.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a suit for possession filed by the respondent-landlord against the appellants-tenants. The property ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Magnetite Powder Price. The court held that triable issues existed but the defendant's defence was not wholly bona fide, warranting security under Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from a summary suit for recovery of Rs. 38,89,674.14 filed by the plaintiff (M/s. Parijat Enterprises...