Search Results for "CRZ clearance"

43 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in National Green Tribunal Act Case Upholding Illegal Storage Facility Removal. Ex Post Facto Clearance Under 2011 Notification Invalid as Storage Terminal Not Located 'In' Notified Port Under Paragraph 8 of Environment Protection Act, 1986.

The appeals were lodged under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, challenging the National Green Tribunal's order that set aside an e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Resort Developer Against Prohibition of Construction in Backwater Island. CRZ Notification 1991 Applies to Backwater Islands; No Development Zone Restrictions Upheld.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Kapico Kerala Resorts Pvt. Ltd. challenging a Kerala High Court order that prohibited resort construction on Ne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Construction in CRZ Area, Upholds NGT Order on Environmental Clearance Validity. Construction of hotel building in Colva, Goa, held not to violate CRZ Notification 1991 as it was within permissible floor space index and setback requirements.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions: Writ Petition No. 751 of 2008 filed by Theodore Fernandes and Goencarancho Vorixtte Awaz (an association) ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Coastal Road Construction in Mumbai — Environmental Clearance Upheld. Court holds that the Mumbai Coastal Road Project (South) is a public utility and the Environmental Clearance granted by SEIAA is valid under CRZ Notification, 2011, and EIA Notification, 2006.

The petitioner, Zoru Darayus Bhathena, a resident of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Environmental Clearance (EC) gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows PIL Challenging Illegal Construction in CRZ Area - Violation of Coastal Regulation Zone Notification and Environmental Laws. Construction of jetty and retaining wall in CRZ-I area without prior approval from MoEF and GCZMA held illegal and directed to be demolished.

The judgment pertains to two Public Interest Litigations filed before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the construction of a jetty and other s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Invalidates Post Facto CRZ Clearance Policy Issued by Union Government. “Environmental Law Cannot Endorse Post Facto Approvals”

The Bombay High Court addressed the legality of an Office Memorandum issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change, which allowed ...