Search Results for "APMC Act 1963"

104 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 104 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Administrator for APMC Ghatanji Due to Expiry of Managing Committee's Term. Postponement of Elections Does Not Imply Extension of Tenure Under Section 15A of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioners, seven individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Hears Letters Patent Appeal Challenging Single Judge Order on RTI Act Applicability to APMC. The appeal raises the question whether Agricultural Produce Market Committee is a public authority under Section 2(h) RTI Act.

Background: The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Arvi, challenging an order of the State I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Resolves Conflict on Cessation of APMC Membership Under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Members Elected by Managing Committees of Cooperative Societies or Village Panchayats Cease to Be APMC Members Upon Losing Membership in the Parent Body.

The case involves a reference to the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur to resolve conflicting Division Bench decisions on the interpretati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Voting Rights for APMC Representatives in Legislative Council Elections. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Not a Local Authority Under Article 171 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Radhakishan Deorao Pathade, Chairman of the Super Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Aurangabad, filed a writ petition seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Whether Writ Petition Against Minister’s Order Under APMC Act Must Be Filed Before Division Bench Due to Lack of Locus Standi of Petitioners. Petitioners Challenge Amalgamation Order Passed Without Jurisdiction Under Section 43 of Maharashtra APMC Act.

The matter arose from a dispute concerning the amalgamation of Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Motala with APMC, Malkapur. Petitioners, ...