Search Results for "Tribunal's factual findings"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Tribunal's factual findings"

1746 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1746 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Cross Arbitration Petitions Challenging Copyright Royalty Award. License Fee and Infringement Claims Under Copyright Act, 1957 and Section 34 of Arbitration Act Evaluated.

31 Aug 2016

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. (IPRS), a copyright society registered under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957, and Entertainment Network...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Slum Land Acquisition and Letter of Intent. Court Holds Petitioner's Ownership Interest Sufficient for Locus Standi but Upholds State Action Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

24 Nov 2010

The case involved two writ petitions filed in 1999 and 2000 under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a land acquisition notification dated 6-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in IBC Financial Creditor Classification Case — Security Deposit for Sales Promotion Not a Financial Debt. Held that a security deposit paid under a service agreement for sales promotion does not constitute a financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as there is no disbursal for time value of money or commercial effect of borrowing.

25 Apr 2024

The Supreme Court allowed appeals against NCLAT judgments that classified security deposits paid by sales promoters as financial debts under the Insol...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging SFIO Investigation Order in Company Law Non-Compliance Case Involving Family Demerger Dispute. The Court considered whether order dated 6 May 2016 directing investigation into affairs of Singhal Enterprises Private Limited under Section 633 and Article 226 should be quashed amid ongoing litigation.

5 Oct 2016

The writ petition was filed by majority shareholders of Singhal Enterprises Private Limited, a Kolkata-based sponge iron manufacturer, against the Add...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Whether an Authorised Dealer Compliant with RBI's FLM Instructions Can Be Held Liable under Sections 6(4) and 6(5) of FERA; Maintainability Not Disputed Despite Co-Noticees' Failure to Appeal.

14 Oct 2010

This matter concerns two appeals filed under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) before the High Court of Bombay, challenging an order of the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Court upholds award granting compensation for work done, security deposit refund, and loss of profit under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2 Jul 2012

The Union of India, through the Chief Project Manager (Conversion), Central Railway, Mumbai, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Distributorship Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Profits for Period Without Written Agreement. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that no implied contract existed for the period 14th June 2006 to 31st March 2007 was not perverse or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Diversey India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Sponsorship Dispute — Holds Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Awarding Interest Without Agreement and Rejecting Counterclaim Without Proper Consideration. The court found that the arbitrator's award of interest at 18% per annum was contrary to the Deal Memo which provided for interest at 18% per annum only after 30 days of default, and that the rejection of the counterclaim for damages due to alleged breach of exclusivity was not supported by reasons.

17 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Rashmi Housing Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments in Co-operative Housing Society. Court Holds That Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments Without General Body Approval Are Void Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

9 Jun 2026

The petitioner, B. K. Corporation, an association of persons, filed a writ petition challenging the validity of a re-development agreement and bye-law...

97 98 99 100 101

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)