High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case — Conviction Upheld as Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reappreciated Under Section 397 Cr.P.C. The court held that once the accused admits his signature on the cheque, the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 arises, and the accused must rebut it with probable evidence; failure to do so results in conviction under Section 138.
24 Feb 2025The petitioner, Thomas Mani, was convicted by the trial court for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for dishonour ...




