Search Results for "Article 13(2)"

1038 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1038 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction in Income Tax Case. Appeal against Bangalore Bench of ITAT lies only before Karnataka High Court under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Pune under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction in Income Tax Case. Appeal Against Bangalore ITAT Order Lies Only Before Karnataka High Court Under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Pune (the Revenue) under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Withdrawal of Suit by Legal Representatives in Property Dispute — Held That Executors of Deceased Plaintiff's Will Are Necessary Parties and Suit Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Their Consent

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by H.H. Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia and Smt. Madhavi Raje Madhavrao Scindia, who are legal representativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition to Quash FIR Under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act Due to False Allegations and Malicious Prosecution. The court quashed the FIR as the allegations were found to be false and motivated, and the wife had made contradictory statements.

The petitioner, Sangeeta Santosh Kadam, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Malaysian National Against DRI for Illegal Detention and Seizure of Passport. Court Directs Return of Passport and Refund of INR 30,000 Collected as Bail, Holding DRI Actions Violate Fundamental Rights Under Articles 21 and 22.

The petitioner, a Malaysian national, arrived at Mumbai airport on 15 March 2019. He was approached by officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intellig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Partition Suit and Upholds Wills in Family Property Dispute. Wills and Codicils Executed by Testator and Testatrix Found Valid, No Undue Influence or Lack of Testamentary Capacity Established.

The judgment concerns a family dispute over the estate of Chimanlal Chinai and his wife Shardaben Chinai. The plaintiffs, legal heirs of Dinkar Chinai...