Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction in Income Tax Case. Appeal Against Bangalore ITAT Order Lies Only Before Karnataka High Court Under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 123
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Pune (the Revenue) under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging an order dated 30.7.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, Bangalore. The appeal relates to Assessment Year 2008-09. At the outset, the respondent, M/s. Sungard Solutions (I) Pvt Ltd, raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal before the Bombay High Court. The respondent argued that since the impugned order was passed by the Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal, the appeal would lie before the Karnataka High Court and not before the Bombay High Court, relying on Sections 260A and 269 of the Act. The Revenue contended that the Bombay High Court had jurisdiction based on the facts of the case. The court considered the submissions and examined the provisions of Chapter XX of the Act, particularly Section 260A, which provides for appeals to the High Court from orders of the Appellate Tribunal. The court noted that the Tribunal's order was passed by the Bangalore Bench, and therefore, the appropriate High Court to entertain the appeal would be the Karnataka High Court. The court held that the appeal was not maintainable before the Bombay High Court and dismissed it accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Territorial Jurisdiction - Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Maintainability of Appeal - The appeal was filed before the Bombay High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench. The respondent raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability, contending that the appeal lies only before the Karnataka High Court. The court upheld the objection, holding that the appeal from an order of the Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal would lie before the Karnataka High Court and not before the Bombay High Court. The appeal was dismissed as not maintainable. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an appeal against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, is maintainable before the Bombay High Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed as not maintainable before this Court. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Jurisdiction of High Court under Section 260A of Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Territorial jurisdiction of High Court over orders of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
  • Maintainability of appeal against order of Bangalore Bench of ITAT before Bombay High Court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (03) 91

Income Tax Appeal No. 1142 of 2016

2019-02-26

Akil Kureshi, M.S. Sanklecha

Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Appellant, Mr. R. Murlidhar i/by P.C. Tripathi for the Respondent

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Pune

M/s. Sungard Solutions (I) Pvt Ltd

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench.

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to challenge the Tribunal's order before the Bombay High Court.

Filing Reason

Revenue aggrieved by order of ITAT, Bangalore Bench.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 30.7.2015 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench.

Issues

Whether an appeal against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, is maintainable before the Bombay High Court.

Submissions/Arguments

Respondent submitted that the impugned order was passed by the Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal, so appeal lies before Karnataka High Court, not Bombay High Court, relying on Sections 260A and 269 of the Act. Appellant submitted that Bombay High Court has jurisdiction in view of the facts giving rise to the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

An appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal lies to the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Bench of the Tribunal that passed the order is situated. Since the impugned order was passed by the Bangalore Bench, the appeal lies only before the Karnataka High Court and not before the Bombay High Court.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal from the order of Banglore Bench of the Tribunal would lie before the Karnataka High Court and not before this Court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable before this Court.

Procedural History

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 before the Bombay High Court against an order dated 30.7.2015 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench. The respondent raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability. The court heard the objection and dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 260A, 269
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Kerala Surcharge on Taxes Act Case Because Act Not Retrospective for Assessment Year 1957-58. Kerala Surcharge on Taxes Act, 1957 Section 2 Held Inapplicable to Agricultural Income-Tax Assessment for Year Beginning A...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Heard Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 Indian Penal Code. Appeal Challenged Reliance on Child Witness and Circumstantial Evidence.