Search Results for "award after expiry"

1399 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1399 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals by Owner and Insurer in Motor Vehicle Accident Case — Compensation of ₹1,40,200 Upheld. Claimant Manjunath awarded compensation for injuries sustained in accident involving vehicle KA-20/550, with owner and insurer held jointly liable.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment and award dated 04.12.2008 passed by the Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Third-Party Liability. Insurer Directed to Pay Compensation and Recover from Owner as Driver Lacked Valid Licence Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the claimant, Karbhari Shinde, sustained serious injuries resulting in amputation of his left leg af...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Challenge to Payment of Wages Award Against Hypothecated Assets. Bank Not an Employer Under Payment of Wages Act, 1936 but Liable as Successor to Employer's Assets Under Section 15(2) for Wages Due.

The petitioner, Chief Executive Officer of Sangli Urban Co-op Bank Ltd., challenged a decree of execution for Rs.37,51,800/- passed by the Authority u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Interim Order in Coal Transport Contract Dispute. Arbitrator's findings on committee report and weighment system held to be interim and not subject to writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s. Sanwal Coal Carriers, a proprietary concern, entered into a contract with Western Coalfields Limited (respondents) for driving pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act Due to Non-Application of Mind. Collector Directed to Decide Afresh After Hearing Petitioners.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original landowner Mahadev Sadhu Ingale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...