Search Results for "tenders"

1256 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1256 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act — Petitioners Guilty of Suppression of Facts. Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Rejected as Petitioners Had Received Compensation and Suppressed Earlier Proceedings.

The petitioners, a husband and wife, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that the acquisition of their lands b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Water Supply to Industries from Irrigation Dams — No Legal Right to Challenge Government Policy on Water Allocation. Court Held That Petitioners Failed to Establish Any Violation of Fundamental Rights or Statutory Provisions.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed as Public Interest Litigations (PILs) before the Bombay High Court. The first petitioner, Suresh Ram...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under RDDB Act, 1993, and Arbitration Clause Cannot Oust It.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Harvestdeal Securities Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Arbitration Clause Does Not Oust Jurisdiction of DRT Under Section 19 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

The petitioner, Harvestdeal Securities Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 19 February 2015, which set asid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition, Holds Accused Cannot Cross-Examine Approver at Pre-Committal Stage Under Section 306(4) CrPC. The right to cross-examine the approver arises only after committal to the Court of Sessions, as the examination under Section 306(4) is for committal purposes only.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, which allowed the respondents (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Apprentice Employees in Zilla Parishad — Violation of Natural Justice and Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Termination of apprentices without inquiry or notice held illegal as they were 'workmen' under the Act.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by 21 individuals who were engaged as apprentices by the Zilla Parishad, Wardha, under the Appre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petition in Section 377 IPC Case Despite Settlement. Court Refuses to Declare Section 377 Unconstitutional as Issue Pending Before Supreme Court and Binding Precedent Upholds Its Validity.

The applicant, Bharatkumar S. Gupta, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of a criminal ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Rejection of Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award. Lump Sum Contract Precludes Claim for Extra Payment Based on Pre-Contractual Meetings.

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arose from an order dated 6 May 2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Against Defendants Over 'SUNCONTROL' Mark. The Court held that 'SUNCONTROL' is descriptive and not distinctive, and that the plaintiff failed to establish secondary meaning or likelihood of confusion.

The plaintiff, Garware Polyester Limited, filed a suit for trade mark infringement and passing off against 3M Company and 3M India Limited, alleging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Discharge of Judicial Officer for Non-Disclosure of Criminal Case in Appointment Form — Suppression of Material Information Found but Discharge Order Set Aside as Disproportionate and Without Natural Justice

The petitioner, Gurunath Dinkar Mane, was selected and appointed as a Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class in Maharashtra...