High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench: Multiple Writ Petitions by Educational Institutions Against State Education Department
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "business centre"
1576 result(s) found
Found 1576 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies 'Commercial Purpose' Under Consumer Protection Act for Company Purchases for Director Use. The Court held that purchase of a vehicle by a company for personal use of its directors does not amount to commercial purpose under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
9 Jul 2024The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals concerning the interpretation of 'commercial purpose' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protec...
- 394
High Court
Supreme Court Allows Union's Appeals in Advance Authorization IGST Exemption Case. The Court upholds the pre-import condition as a valid policy measure to prevent double benefit and cash blockage, reversing the Gujarat High Court's decision.
10 Oct 2024The case involves appeals by the Union of India against a Gujarat High Court judgment that set aside the mandatory 'pre-import condition' for claiming...
- 699
High Court
Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Commercial Summary Suit for Non-Compliance with Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate genuine urgency to bypass mandatory pre-institution mediation, as the suit sought recovery of development management fees and security deposit without any specific instances of imminent threat.
11 Nov 2024The plaintiff, Ekta Housing Private Limited, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against Shraddha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. and two individual guarantors for rec...
- 936
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Tie-Up Agreement Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Finding that Agreements Were Joint Venture, Not Loan, and Confirms Award of Counterclaim with Interest.
7 Mar 2025The appellant, National Agricultural Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Limited (NAFED), and the first respondent, Roj Enterprises (P) Limited...
- 405
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Kerala Land Reforms Act Case — Quarrying Land Not Exempt as Commercial Site. Land used for quarrying does not fall within the definition of 'commercial site' under Section 2(5) read with Section 81(1)(q) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and is not exempt from ceiling provisions.
30 Sep 2019The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by K.H. Nazar against the judgment of the Full Bench of the Kerala High Court, which held that land used...
- 243
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Service Tax Show Cause Notice Issued by Non-Jurisdictional Commissionerate. Notice issued by Delhi Commissionerate for Mumbai-based assessee held without jurisdiction as territorial jurisdiction lies with Commissionerate where the assessee's registered office is located.
17 Jan 2023The Petitioner, CMA-CGM Agencies (India) Pvt. Ltd. (formerly APL (India) Pvt. Ltd.), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, is engaged ...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Notice Issued Beyond Four Years Based on Same Material as Original Assessment Held Invalid.
23 Feb 2023The petitioner, Vibrant Securities Private Limited, a company engaged in stock broking and proprietary trading, challenged a notice under section 148 ...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Hoarding Allotment Due to Procedural Irregularities and Non-Compliance with Government Resolutions. The court held that the allotment of a hoarding site on government land without following the prescribed procedure of inviting tenders and without considering the petitioner's prior rights was illegal and arbitrary.
19 Oct 2023The Petitioner, Sanjiv Manmohan Gupta, carrying on business as M/s. Global Advertisers, challenged the order dated 20th August 2021 allotting a hoardi...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Ulhasnagar Development Plan, Upholds Statutory Process. Court holds that objections to draft development plan must be raised before the planning authority under MRTP Act, and belated challenges after final notification are not maintainable.
19 Dec 2023The judgment concerns two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the development plan for Ulhasnagar city. ...
- 74
