Search Results for "agreement termination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "agreement termination"

2137 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2137 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bail Under Section 436-A CrPC to Convict in Pending Appeal — Mandatory Provision Overrides Section 389 CrPC Restrictions. Section 436-A CrPC Held Mandatory and Not Subject to Section 389 CrPC; Detention Period Includes Pre- and Post-Conviction Detention; Maximum Sentence for Computation is Maximum Imposable Sentence.

28 Aug 2020

The applicant, Maksud Sheikh Gaffur Sheikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-4, Chandrapur on 01.08.2016 in Session Trial No.22 of 2015 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Dealership Agreement for Violation of Natural Justice — Indian Oil Corporation's Communication Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Principles of Audi Alteram Partem. The court held that termination without proper show cause notice and opportunity of hearing is arbitrary and liable to be quashed.

29 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Parbat s/o Namdeo Naikwadi, was a dealer of Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) at Gardani, Akole, Ahmednagar. He filed a writ petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Writ Petition in Rent Control Eviction Suit Due to Limitation Bar. Suit for possession under Section 13(1)(l) of Bombay Rent Act filed 12 years after tenant acquired alternate accommodation held time-barred under Article 67 of Limitation Act, 1963.

2 Jul 2010

The case involves a dispute between landlords (respondents) and tenants (petitioners) over eviction from suit premises. The respondents, owners of the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition by Bank Officials Against Order Taking Cognizance in Cheque Dishonour Case — Complaint Not Barred by Limitation Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the limitation period under Section 142(b) of the N.I. Act is one month from the date of receipt of notice, and the complaint filed within that period is valid.

13 Dec 2019

The petitioners, who are officials of the State Bank of India (formerly State Bank of Mysore), filed a Criminal Revision Petition under Section 397 re...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Calcutta High Court's Order Appointing Arbitrator Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Territorial Jurisdiction for Section 11 Application Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Depends on Court as Defined in Section 2(1)(e), Not Merely on Seat Designation in Arbitration Clause.

24 Mar 2022

The appeals arose from orders of the Calcutta High Court dated 13 August 2021 and 4 October 2021. The appellant and respondent had entered into a deve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitral Award Challenge — No Automatic Stay Under Section 36 of Arbitration Act Without Strong Prima Facie Case. Court holds that mere filing of Section 34 petition does not warrant stay; applicant must demonstrate irreparable harm and balance of convenience.

14 Dec 2020

The judgment concerns an interim application filed by Kishor N Shah and others (the Shahs) under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Landowners Challenging Appointment of Arbitrator in Development Dispute. Disputes under Development Agreements Held Arbitrable Due to Existence of Arbitration Clause Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two arbitration appeals (Arbitration Appeal No. 102 of 2024 and Arbitration Appeal No. 101 of 2024) along with interim applic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Port Development Dispute — Liquidated Damages Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Proof of Actual Loss. The court held that under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, proof of actual loss is necessary for claiming liquidated damages, and the arbitrator's finding was not patently illegal.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Board of Trustees for Jawaharlal Nehru Port, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a licence agreement ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Foreign Award — Part I of Arbitration Act Inapplicable. Section 34 petition under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 held not maintainable for foreign award with seat in London.

20 Jan 2015

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appellant's arbitration petition under section 34 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

1 Jan 2026

The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...

93 94 95 96 97

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)