Search Results for "additional fee"

1957 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1957 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Revenue Authorities to Process Phodi Applications Without NOC from KIADB for Land Granted in 1939-40. The court held that KIADB has no jurisdiction over grants made prior to its establishment, and thus authorities cannot insist on NOC from KIADB for phodi.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of 5 acres of land in Sy.No.1 of M.Satyawara Village, Sulibele Hobli, Hoskote Taluk, Bangalore Rural District, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Appointment of Administrator for Milk Producers' Cooperative Societies Due to Lack of Hearing. Appointment under Section 12(6) of Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 set aside as petitioners were not given opportunity of hearing before removal of elected board.

The petitioners, three milk producers' cooperative societies, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Land Revenue Case — Tahsildar's Order Under Section 140(2) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Restored. Single Judge Erred in Quashing Mutation Entry Without Considering Appellant's Right to Be Heard and Limitation for Challenge.

The appellant, Sunil Chajed, claimed to be the owner of land measuring 1 acre and 4.08 guntas bearing Sy.No.91/1A. The Tahsildar, Bengaluru East Taluk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Penalty Imposed by MUDA on Allottee for Violation of Natural Justice — Penalty Without Show Cause Notice Set Aside. Succession Rights Recognized and Authority Directed to Follow Due Process Before Imposing Penalty.

The petitioner, Radhika Bhat, filed a writ petition challenging an endorsement dated 23-11-2016 issued by the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Sets Aside Decree for Non-Compliance with Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Pay Balance Consideration, Rendering Specific Performance Unwarranted.

The case involves a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the original defendant No. 2 (appellant) challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Injured Motorcyclist in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.10,44,212/- Modified to Rs.25,00,000/- with 9% Interest. Future Loss of Income Recalculated Based on Notional Income of Rs.4,500/- per Month and 40% Disability.

The appellant, Ambala Muljibhai Makwana (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), was driving a motor cycle on 18.01.2003 when a tanker bearing re...