Search Results for "Statutory purchase"

2851 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2851 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholding Concurrent Findings on Title and Possession. Adverse Possession Claim Fails as Appellant Failed to Prove Hostile Possession for Statutory Period Under Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant (appellant) against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and first appellate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices and Orders Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Valid Sanction and Non-Application of Mind. Reassessment proceedings initiated without proper approval under Section 151(2) and based on borrowed satisfaction are invalid.

The petitioner, Ashok Commercial Enterprises, filed nine writ petitions challenging reassessment notices dated 19th July 2021 and 14th July 2021 issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute Based on Agreement to Sell and Possessory Rights. Court Restrains Defendant from Alienating Suit Property or Acting on Assignment Deed, Directs Plaintiff to Pay Accommodation Charges to Tenants.

The dispute pertains to a property known as 'Sharda Niwas' in Goregaon, Mumbai. The plaintiff, Jagdish Harkishan Sharma, claimed to have entered into ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award — Holds That Single Judge Erred in Setting Aside Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. The Court Reinstated the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Oral Agreement and Quantum of Damages.

The appellant, Ratnam Sudesh Iyer, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the judgment of a learned Si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Applications in International Commercial Arbitration — Habitual Residence Determined at Time of Agreement. Applicant Residing in UAE at Time of Agreement Held to be Habitually Resident Outside India Under Section 2(1)(f)(i) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns three arbitration applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Aslam Ismail Khan Deshmu...