RFIRST APPEAL NO. 3732 of 2023
30 Jan 2026The High Court of Gujarat heard two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limite...
Search Results for "Jurisdictional Objection"
1442 result(s) found
Found 1442 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Examines City Civil Court's Jurisdiction in Injunction Suit by Owner Against Family Members. Challenge to Maintainability of Suit for Injunction Without Declaration Under Specific Relief Act and Jurisdiction Under Provincial Small Cause Courts Act.
25 Apr 2014The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution arose from a suit for permanent injunction filed by a mother-in-law, claiming ownership of a r...
- 128
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Whether Aurangabad Court Had Territorial Jurisdiction Under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for Property in Hingoli. District Court Held It Lacked Jurisdiction; Appeal Outcome Not Provided.
9 May 2014The dispute arose out of a partnership firm, M/s Kasliwal Empire, formed by the appellant and respondent on 7.3.2007 for developing housing projects. ...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Cross-Petitions Against Labour Court Awards Awarding Compensation to Workmen Dismissed After Strike; Maintainability of Reference Under Industrial Disputes Act and Proportionality of Punishment Examined.
20 Feb 2014The matter involved cross writ petitions arising from Labour Court awards concerning the dismissal of workmen employed by Haldyn Glass Limited. In the...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment on Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Consortium's Financial Bid in Municipal Water Supply Tender; Court Examines Scope of Judicial Review Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
11 Jun 2012The petitioners, a consortium of three companies, challenged the decision of the Mira Bhayander Municipal Corporation's Standing Committee which disqu...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Case — Interim Stay on Nomination of Non-Functional Director. Court Examines Interpretation of Section 397 of Companies Act, 1956 Regarding Automatic Winding Up upon Establishing Oppression and Power to Mould Relief.
16 Jun 2025The judgment under consideration arises from two company appeals filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 before the Bombay High Court, chal...
- 44
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Valuation of Body-Built Vehicles Including 10% Notional Profit but Rejects Extended Limitation Under Section 11A. Assessee Job Worker Liable to Include 110% Chassis Value in Excise Duty Computation, Yet Department Cannot Invoke Extended Period Absent Wilful Suppression.
1 Jan 1970The appeals arose from a dispute between job workers engaged in body-building of motor vehicles and the Central Excise and Service Tax Department. The...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench Examined Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Rejection of Nomination in Gram Panchayat Elections. Reference Concerned Whether Article 243-O(b) of Constitution of India Bars Judicial Review of Returning Officer's Rejection of Nomination and Whether Such Challenge Obstructs or Facilitates Election Process.
13 Jan 2021The judgment before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging order...
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petition Against Order Disqualifying Cooperative Society Committee Members for Failure to Lodge Election Expense Accounts under Rule 66; Alternate Remedy of Revision Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 was raised. The court was required to determine jurisdiction of District Cooperative Election Officer, locus standi of non-contestant complainant, and whether justification for delay in filing election expense accounts could be condoned under Rule 66(b).
27 Sep 2023In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, a writ petition was filed by thirteen elected members of the Managing Committ...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Application for Construction in Pachmarhi Wildlife Sanctuary Due to Pending Stay on Exclusion. Applicant's land not finally excluded from sanctuary; High Court's interim stay on Collector's order prevents any commercial activity without Court permission.
16 May 2024The applicant, M/s Shewalkar Developers Limited, filed interlocutory applications seeking permission to construct a health/eco-resort on two plots (Pl...
- 571
