Search Results for "Infrastructure"

2360 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2360 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Application Due to Invalid Arbitration Clause. Mere Use of Word 'Arbitration' in Jurisdiction Clause Does Not Constitute Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, Reshamsingh and Co. Pvt. Ltd., entered into a charter party agreement with the respondent, Dharti Dredging and Infrastructure Ltd., on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Dispute Due to Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator. Failure to Respond to Notice Invoking Arbitration Constitutes Refusal to Appoint Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Khurana Constructions, entered into an agreement with the respondent, IOT Infrastructure and Energy Services Ltd., on 28 February...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree — Court Receiver Need Not Seek Separate Leave to Sue When Appointed with Full Powers Under Order 40 Rule 1(d) CPC. Notice Under Section 106 T.P. Act Demanding Immediate Possession Is Not Invalid If Suit Filed After Notice Period.

The plaintiff, the Court Receiver appointed by the High Court in Suit No.234 of 1987, was the receiver of the suit property 'Dev Ashish' at Peddar Roa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Bank Guarantees in Tender Dispute. Earnest Money Deposit Forfeited as Bidder's Unilateral Discount Offer After Bid Opening Violated Tender Terms.

The petitioner, Knowledge Infrastructure Systems Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in coal trading, along with its shareholder, filed a writ petition under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Distance Requirement Between General and Hazardous Cargo at Container Freight Stations. Circular 4/2011 and Public Notice 8/2011 prescribing 30-meter distance held valid under Customs Act, 1962 and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

The petitioner, M/s. CFS Association of India, representing eleven Container Freight Stations (CFS) handling nearly 80% of local container cargo at Nh...