Search Results for "substantial implementation"

1161 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1161 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Granting 2nd ACP Benefit to Senior Supervisors. Educational Qualification for Promotional Post Not Required for ACP Scheme Under Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008.

The case pertains to a writ petition filed by the Union of India and others challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mumbai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Blacklisting by Railways — Violation of Natural Justice and Unreasoned Order. The court set aside the blacklisting order for being arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Apar Industries Ltd., a major supplier of Over Head Equipment to the Indian Railways, challenged a blacklisting order passed by the Ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Safeguard Duty on Aluminum Foil Imports. Court upholds imposition of provisional safeguard duty under Section 8B of Customs Tariff Act, 1975, finding no violation of natural justice as petitioner was heard before final determination.

The petitioner, P. G. Foils Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Customs Notification No.26/2009 dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Land Record Correction Appeal. Delay of 30 Years Condoned as Sufficient Cause Shown for Non-Filing of Appeal Within Limitation Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Hari G. Koli, challenged an order dated August 21, 2019 passed by the District Superintendent of Land Records, Solapur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Writ Petition, Directs Execution of Section 14 SARFAESI Order Despite Pending Civil Suit. Executive Magistrate Cannot Refuse Possession on Ground of Civil Suit; Role Under Section 14 is Ministerial.

The Petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a banking company, had sanctioned a housing loan to Dipak Digambar Naik and Aruna Naik (co-borrowers) in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petitions of Contractual Teachers Challenging Termination Under Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan. Teachers appointed on contract basis have no right to regularization; government policy decision to discontinue scheme is valid.

The petitioners, contractual teachers appointed under the Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (formerly Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan), challenged their termination by th...